So my text (Ryder 2nd edition, page 252) is defining the "pure gauge-field Lagrangian" as:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex] G_{\mu \nu}\equiv \partial_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}-ig\left[ A_{\mu},A_{\nu}\right] [/itex]

[itex] \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4}Tr G_{\mu \nu} G^{\mu \nu} [/itex]

Dumb question:

Isn't [itex]G_{\mu \nu} G^{\mu \nu} [/itex] being summed over, and hence, scalar?

How is trace even defined on a scalar quantity? Is the trace only applying to the first G and is a scalar factor for the second?

I feel like I'm missing something obvious here.

Thanks for any and all advice.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Faddov Ghosts and the non-Abelian Lagrangian

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**