Falling Objects (With air resistance)

Click For Summary
In discussions about falling objects with air resistance, it is established that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones due to the effects of gravity and air resistance. The example of two identical jugs—one filled with water and the other empty—illustrates this principle, as the filled jug will hit the ground first. The argument hinges on the relationship between mass, gravitational force, and the force of air resistance, which affects acceleration differently based on mass. Heavier objects experience less relative air resistance, allowing them to maintain higher acceleration and speed throughout the fall. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the heavier jug will consistently be closer to the ground than the lighter one during the fall.
Morcam
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So, I've been having a bit of an argument with a guy about falling, identical items, with varying masses.

Homework Statement



For the sake of the argument, we've been using the example of two identical jugs, one filled with water, and the other without. They are dropped at exactly the same time. I believe the one filled with water will hit the ground first, due to air resistance. He believes they will hit at the same time. I agree that they will, in a vacuum.

Homework Equations



Force of Air Resistance = Constant
Fg = m * g

The Attempt at a Solution



http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/u2l3e.cfm

In situations in which there is air resistance, more massive objects fall faster than less massive objects. But why? To answer the why question, it is necessary to consider the free-body diagrams for objects of different mass. Consider the falling motion of two skydivers: one with a mass of 100 kg (skydiver plus parachute) and the other with a mass of 150 kg (skydiver plus parachute). The free-body diagrams are shown below for the instant in time in which they have reached terminal velocity.

I'm not entirely sure why we're still having this argument, but he's very insistent, so I'd like a final answer from someone who knows this firsthand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the heavier jug will hit the ground faster. There's absolutely no room for an argument to the contrary. To take an extreme case, a paper jug would take seconds to fall to the ground from eye level.
 
As the (possibly mentally defective) friend from morcams above post, I'd like to ensure I'm totally wrong by asking for a second opinion.
 
DarthPJB said:
As the (possibly mentally defective) friend from morcams above post, I'd like to ensure I'm totally wrong by asking for a second opinion.

Until the second opinion comes, I'll expand a bit on my answer. The force of gravity is mg, and air resistance is kAv^2. k is a constant, A is the cross-sectional area, and v is speed. Newton's second law says F=ma, so mg-kAv^2 = ma and a=g-kAv^2/m. Solving this equation will yield a position vs. time equation, but it's not necessary to go that far. Just examining the equation will do.

Go through this in your head: A jug is dropped. Gravity accelerates it at 9.8 m/s: that's the "g" in the equation a=g-kAv^2/m. If the mass is tiny, kAv^2/m would be huge, and acceleration would immediately drop. If the mass is high, kAv^2/m would be tiny, and acceleration would decrease slowly.

So the conclusions are:

(1) At every point in time during the fall, the heavier jug has a greater acceleration than the light one.
(2) At every point in time during the fall, the heavier jug has a greater speed than the light one.
(3) At every point in time during the fall, the heavier jug is closer to the ground than the light one.
 
I think perhaps I should have drunk a little less at the weekends while at collage, somehow I managed to have an hour argument over something so very obvious.
I was so sure I was right, I suppose this is how wars get started!
I'm going to accept my utter stupidity and ignorance in this matter and thank you kindly for your reply.

Now all I have to do is survive morcams jokes :/
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K