Free falling with air resistance question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 2K views
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


An object falls under gravity and air resistance force bv. It is known there is a characteristic time τ=m/b such that the object comes close to the terminal velocity for t>>τ. Derive an exact expression for the distance d traveled at time t.

Homework Equations


not sure, dv/dt=g-γv...(1) ,where γ=b/m, or v=v∞(1-e^(-γt))...(2) , v∞=g/γ...(3)

The Attempt at a Solution


the answer is d=mgτ/eb.
First, I don't understand why can't I integrate equation (1) this way...
dv/dt=g-γv
v=gt-γd
d=(gt-v)/γ =gτ^2-gτ^2 =0 which is wrong

Then, I tried to integrate equation (2),
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))+C
put t=0,v=0,d=0
C=-v∞γ=-g
so,
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))-g
putting the information inside
d=gτ(τ+(1/τe))-g
=gτ^2 + g/e -g
=(gτ^2e+g-ge) /e

PLEASE HELP , THX
 
on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:
First, I don't understand why can't I integrate equation (1) this way...
dv/dt=g-γv
v=gt-γd
dv/dt=g-γv is a differential equation which describes velocity as a function of time i.e. v(t). Velocity is not constant w.r.t. time but is a function of time .So, you can't integrate the RHS as ∫(g-γv)dt. You'll have to separate the appropriate variables.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
Derive an exact expression for the distance d traveled at time t.
The answer given for d is true for t=τ and not t>>τ.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
1.
3. The Attempt at a Solution

the answer is d=mgτ/eb.
First, I don't understand why can't I integrate equation (1) this way...
dv/dt=g-γv
v=gt-γd
d=(gt-v)/γ =gτ^2-gτ^2 =0 which is wrong
You can integrate that way (taking definite integrals in both sides with time points t=0 and ##t=\tau##) but ##v(\tau)## is not equal to ##g\tau## because the object doesn't do free fall exactly.

Then, I tried to integrate equation (2),
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))+C
put t=0,v=0,d=0
C=-v∞γ=-g
so,
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))-g
putting the information inside
d=gτ(τ+(1/τe))-g
=gτ^2 + g/e -g
=(gτ^2e+g-ge) /e

PLEASE HELP , THX
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Delta² said:
You can integrate that way (taking definite integrals in both sides with time points t=0 and ##t=\tau##) but ##v(\tau)## is not equal to ##g\tau## because the object doesn't do free fall exactly.

Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=gτ (1/γ = τ)?
 
Clara Chung said:
Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=gτ (1/γ = τ)?

yes that's correct. But this doesn't mean that d=0, it is still ##d=(gt-v)/\gamma## where ##t>>\tau## not ##t=\tau##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=gτ (1/γ = τ)?
t>>τ implies that the velocity at time t is g/γ. At time τ, the velocity is still changing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=g/γ?

Oh I got it.:) But how to solve the question with equation (2) now?
 
You can continue with the initial approach and plug in ##v(\tau)## from the equation ##v(t)=v_{\infty}(1-e^{-\gamma t})##.

Or as you go by integrating (2) I see a mistake in the integration, it is ##\int -e^{-\gamma t}=\frac{e^{-\gamma t}}{\gamma}+C##

But you got me confused, you want d at time ##\tau## or d at time ##t>>\tau##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Delta² said:
You can continue with the initial approach and plug in ##v(\tau)## from the equation ##v(t)=v_{\infty}(1-e^{-\gamma t})##.

Or as you go by integrating (2) I see a mistake in the integration, it is ##\int -e^{-\gamma t}=\frac{e^{-\gamma t}}{\gamma}+C##

But you got me confused, you want d at time ##\tau## or d at time ##t>>\tau##?
Oh my god... thanks for reminding me, now I've solved it
 
Clara Chung said:
Oh my god... thanks for reminding me, now I've solved it

I think the question need me to find t tends to τ, as v at τ is the same as t>>τ ,so my dv/dt can't set to be 0 as the curve hasn't level off. Not sure about it
 
No sorry velocity at time ##t=\tau## is quite different from velocity at time ##t>>\tau##.

The velocity at time ##t=10\tau## is probably close enough to the final velocity ##v_{\infty}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
as v at τ is the same as t>>τ
No. Terminal velocity is attained at t>>τ. As Delta2 said, it could be 10τ. In fact, the output is approximately equal to the steady state value after 5τ (99%). So practically, for any value of t after t=5τ, the output can be said to have reached steady state.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung