Famous Arcsin Formula for e^x / Sqrt[1-e^[2x]] (Scan Paper)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riazy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integral of the function $e^x / \sqrt{1-e^{2x}}$, which is recognized as related to the arcsin formula. Participants detail the process of variable substitution, specifically using u=e^x and subsequently transforming the integral into a simpler form. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the terms in the integral, particularly the extra 'u' in the numerator, which complicates direct application of the arcsin derivative. Ultimately, the correct substitution leads to the integrand fitting the arcsin formula, confirming its validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and substitution techniques
  • Familiarity with the arcsin function and its derivatives
  • Knowledge of exponential functions, specifically $e^x$
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions under square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the arcsin formula in integral calculus
  • Practice variable substitution in integrals involving exponential functions
  • Explore the properties of the exponential function $e^x$ and its derivatives
  • Learn about integrals involving square roots and their simplifications
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on integral calculus, and anyone interested in the application of the arcsin function in integration problems.

Riazy
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
$e^x / Sqrt[1-e^[2x]] (An integral with e^x div by algebraic expressions)(Scan paper)

Homework Statement



Ok I will try my best to write this with digital characters: $e^x / Sqrt[1-e^[2x]]
You will see the problem attached on an image below for more details.

e^x is present

Homework Equations



When I do a variable switch, I recalled a famous arcsin formula (also listed below on my scanned paper)


The Attempt at a Solution



See the picture below

[PLAIN]http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/2892/img0003001.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


You were right to think that it was an arcsin integral. This is how it is derived:

You have to do substitution it twice and there is a restricting on x.
2eoya8m.jpg
 


If your integral became

\int \frac{u}{\sqrt{1-u^2}} du

then just do another substitution like t=1-u2, which would make your integral much simpler.
 


rock.freak667 said:
If your integral became

\int \frac{u}{\sqrt{1-u^2}} du

then just do another substitution like t=1-u2, which would make your integral much simpler.

But if you do that, wouldn't there be a radical in the numerator?
If you let t = 1-u2
Then...

\int \frac{u}{\sqrt{1-u^2}} du becomes \int \frac{\sqrt{t^2-1}}{t} du
Or am I missing something?
 


planauts said:
But if you do that, wouldn't there be a radical in the numerator?
If you let t = 1-u2
Then...

\int \frac{u}{\sqrt{1-u^2}} du becomes \int \frac{\sqrt{t^2-1}}{t} du
Or am I missing something?

You'd need to get dt=2u du, such that u du=dt/2.
 


how did you make v = sin x = arcsin (v)

Because as far as I am concerned its not appearing in the integral yet


Wait.. Did you use U as e^x and both sin x at the same time`?, both of them up there are u:s then?
 
Last edited:


Riazy said:
how did you make v = sin x = arcsin (v)

Because as far as I am concerned its not appearing in the integral yet


Wait.. Did you use U as e^x and both sin x at the same time`?, both of them up there are u:s then?

Your integral contains an extra 'u' term in the numerator, so you can't really just use the result to get arcsine.
 


rock.freak667 said:
Your integral contains an extra 'u' term in the numerator, so you can't really just use the result to get arcsine.

And it should not contain that extra u term.

If you use u=e^x, then du=e^x dx

Your original integrand: e^x dx / (sqrt(1-e^2x))

So you get a new integrand: du / (sqrt (1-u^2)) ... which fits the formula from the back of your head. Planauts basically showed how that arcsin derivative was confirmed.
 


Next time I should read the entire integral to be done instead of the last one :redface:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K