Faraday's Disk Dynamo: why is there an emf?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jpas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk Dynamo Emf
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the apparent paradox of Faraday's Disk Dynamo, where a rotating disk in a uniform magnetic field seems to produce no electromotive force (emf) despite Faraday's law stating otherwise. The key insight is that while the magnetic field (\vec B) and the area of the disk appear constant, the conduction path used to measure emf is invalid. A valid conduction path reveals that the area is, in fact, changing, leading to a change in magnetic flux and thus generating emf. This clarification resolves the confusion surrounding the application of Faraday's law in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction
  • Familiarity with magnetic flux concepts
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic fields and their properties
  • Basic principles of electric circuits and conduction paths
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the paper referenced in the discussion for a detailed explanation of the conduction path issue
  • Explore advanced topics in electromagnetic induction, focusing on rotating systems
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of emf in non-static magnetic fields
  • Study practical applications of Faraday's law in electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism who seek to deepen their understanding of electromagnetic induction and its applications in rotating systems.

jpas
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Consider a rotating disk on a uniform magnetic field. Faraday's law states that

\epsilon = - \frac{d\phi}{dt}

In this situation, \vec B is constant and the area of the disk is constant. Hence, the magnetic flux is constant and there should be no emf. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jpas said:
Consider a rotating disk on a uniform magnetic field. Faraday's law states that

\epsilon = - \frac{d\phi}{dt}

In this situation, \vec B is constant and the area of the disk is constant. Hence, the magnetic flux is constant and there should be no emf. What am I missing?

This question is common and has been discussed in several threads previously.

This is one of those tricky situations that appears paradoxical, but really isn't. This paper provides a good explanation.

Basically, even though the field could be considered constant, the total flux includes area. The area also appears constant at first, but as this paper shows, the conduction path usually chosen is not valid. In reality, the area is changing if a valid conduction path is chosen. And, changing area with constant field gives rise to a flux change.
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
623
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
4K