Faster Than Light Travel: Wormhole Questions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob Porter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wormhole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of wormholes and their potential for enabling faster-than-light travel. Participants explore theoretical implications, mechanics of wormhole operation, and the associated paradoxes, with a focus on the nature of space and time in relation to wormhole travel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if a wormhole is opened and one travels halfway through, closing it could allow the other side of space to "normalize" faster than light, potentially enabling faster-than-light travel.
  • Another participant counters that wormholes provide a shorter connection between two points, negating the need for closing a wormhole to achieve faster-than-light travel, as the travel itself does not exceed light speed.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of time travel paradoxes if wormholes are indeed possible.
  • A participant elaborates on the mechanics of opening a wormhole, questioning the logic behind the idea of opening a wormhole faster and discussing the practical timescales involved in wormhole operation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanics and implications of wormhole travel, with no consensus reached on the feasibility of the proposed ideas or the nature of the processes involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of wormhole mechanics and the potential for time travel paradoxes, indicating that assumptions about the nature of space and the operation of wormholes remain unresolved.

Bob Porter
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When a wormhole opens, if each side of space is equally stretched to meet each other. Then wouldn't it be possible to only go halfway through the wormhole, close it and allow the opposite side of space you're trying to reach, "normalize" and wouldn't the space on the side you've traveled to that "normalized" return to itself faster than the speed of light allowing for faster than light speed travelling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bob Porter said:
if each side of space is equally stretched to meet each other.
That is not a good description.

If wormholes are possible, they allow you to reach some destination faster than light would need for the regular trip (without wormhole). There is no need to close a wormhole or whatever. The wormhole itself provides a shorter connection. You never travel faster than light - you just take a shorter connection. Light going through the wormhole as well would still be faster than you.

Also, if wormholes are possible, it is nearly impossible to avoid time travel paradoxes.
 
mfb said:
That is not a good description.

If wormholes are possible, they allow you to reach some destination faster than light would need for the regular trip (without wormhole). There is no need to close a wormhole or whatever. The wormhole itself provides a shorter connection. You never travel faster than light - you just take a shorter connection. Light going through the wormhole as well would still be faster than you.

Also, if wormholes are possible, it is nearly impossible to avoid time travel paradoxes.
What I was trying to say was, If I used my incredible technology to open a wormhole to travel to you, in which you are several thousand light years away. At the same time, you opened a worm hole allowing the worm hole to be opened faster. Then once I travel technically to you, the space you were controlling, turn my technology off, then turn off your tech. Your side of space would return to normal in half the time since your technology only had to establish the connection half way.
 
Bob Porter said:
At the same time, you opened a worm hole allowing the worm hole to be opened faster.
That doesn't make sense.
Also, while we do not have wormhole generators for a reliable time estimate, the typical timescale for the process would be the size divided by the speed of light - less than a microsecond for all practical purposes. There is no need to speed up a process that takes a microsecond.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K