Fatal Pressure in Car Crashes with Airbags & Seatbelts

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of car crashes, specifically focusing on the role of airbags and seatbelts in minimizing injury. The original poster is investigating how to quantify the pressure experienced by a driver during a collision and what levels of pressure might be considered fatal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between pressure, energy absorption, and injury severity in car crashes. Questions are raised about the appropriate area to consider for the impact of airbags and seatbelts, as well as the nature of pressure and its effects on different body parts.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with some participants suggesting that energy absorbed may be a more relevant measure than pressure. The original poster is reconsidering their assumptions about the areas used for calculations and the implications of pressure on different body parts. Guidance has been offered regarding the focus on the cushioning effect of airbags compared to seatbelts.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working within the constraints of a grade 11 physics paper, which requires them to explain the physics behind airbags and their effectiveness in reducing injury during collisions. There is uncertainty about how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the numerical values and comparisons needed for their analysis.

Frank_Horrigan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, for a part of my grade 11 physics paper I have to describe how air bags are useful in car crashes. So far what I've done is a sample crash, calculating how much force is on the driver, then i calculated the pressure that would be on the driver. I was wondering how much pressure would be fatal in a car accident, if anyone could point me to a site or something which explains this I would be grateful.

Another question, what would be reasonable area to use for car crashes

With aibag and seatbelt hitting the chest (I said .5m^2)
With onyl seatbelt hitting the chest (I said .025 m^2 (thinking seatbelt covers 5 cm x50 cm of your body))
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert here, but I'll set the ball rolling...

I suspect that the amount of energy (rather than pressure) absorbed by the various parts of the occupants of the car is of more use in determining the extent of injury that the occupants suffer. Being subjected to a very high pressure for a very short time can cause less damage to a person than being subjected to a moderate pressure for a longer time, and your investigation should account for this. However, you seem to be getting there...

As for your contact areas, I think that your seat-belt only value is close enough (perhaps a little bit high, especially if you consider non-uniform loading). Your seat-belt and airbag value seems very high though, what type of airbag is this?
 
After thinking about what you said about the air bag I decided to change my size down to .3m^2 which to me seems more reasonable. I don't know what to do about the pressure injury aspect of this problem though, the exact problem says explain how airbags minimize injury during a head on collision using physics diagrams and examples. I'm not sure if this means to explain how much damage was actually done, or if it means to just compare airbags to seatbelts. After thinking the pressure thing through more it seems that the question doesn't really work because I would think that pressure done to your face would result in more damage then the chest area. So there is no numerical value to the amount of pressure probably.


I guess I will just comapre the two and come up with a diagram for it.
 
Any numerical value of pressure would indeed change rapidly with time over the course of a collision, and (as you say) have different implications for different body parts. If you want to think about numbers, I think that energy transferred to the victim would be a more useful parameter, but I'd like someone else's opinion on this.

For now, I would probably concentrate on looking at the reasons why airbags can help to prevent injury, as compared with seatbelts. You should be thinking about what the effect of cushioning actually is, - reducing the magnitude of deceleration of the victim's head. You could easily have diagrams (and even sketched graphs, with a little imagination) here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K