Fermi-dirac statistics, Griffiths 5.28

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on evaluating the integrals from Griffiths' textbook, specifically equations 5.108 and 5.109, for identical fermions at absolute zero. The chemical potential at this temperature equals the Fermi energy (E_f), which influences the limits of integration. The participants conclude that the integrals should be evaluated only up to the Fermi wave vector (k_F) since the integrand approaches zero for k values exceeding the Fermi energy. This approach ensures convergence and simplifies the calculations for both integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly Fermi energy
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, specifically improper integrals
  • Ability to manipulate exponential functions in the context of statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Fermi-Dirac distribution and its implications at absolute zero
  • Learn about the significance of the Fermi wave vector (k_F) in quantum systems
  • Explore the evaluation of improper integrals in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between chemical potential and Fermi energy in fermionic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, will benefit from this discussion. It is especially relevant for those working with fermionic systems and seeking to understand the implications of Fermi-Dirac statistics at absolute zero.

Elvex
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the integrals (eqns 5.108 and 5.109) for the case of identical fermions at absolute zero.


Homework Equations



5.108
N=\frac{V}{2\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{k^2}{e^{[(\hbar^{2}k^{2}/2m)-\mu]/kT}+1}dk

5.109
E=\frac{V}{2\pi^2}\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{k^4}{e^{[(\hbar^{2}k^{2}/2m)-\mu]/kT}+1}dk

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so at absolute zero, the chemical potential is equal to the fermi energy E_f. I'm not sure how to approach either integral because of the T dependence in the denominator in the argument of the exponential.
Aren't there two cases, one for the energy of the state being above the chemical potential, and another for it being less than.
If the energy is less, then the argument goes to - infinite, and the integral is just of k^2, from 0 to infinite... that doesn't seem right.
If the energy is greater than mu, then the argument goes to positive infinite, and the integrand goes to 0. Fantastic.

There's got to be something going on with the expressions in the argument of hte exponential to give a reasonable integrand for T=0.
I think I'm missing some crucial observation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at equations [5.103] and [5.104].
 
OK, so for the first integral. I have a feeling that I need to change the limits of integration because once I get to k values that exceed the Fermi-Energy, the integrand goes to zero, so setting the upper limit to a specific k value will ensure convergence as well.

Oh ok, this is the probably the same method for the second integral as well.
 
Elvex said:
OK, so for the first integral. I have a feeling that I need to change the limits of integration because once I get to k values that exceed the Fermi-Energy, the integrand goes to zero, so setting the upper limit to a specific k value will ensure convergence as well.

Oh ok, this is the probably the same method for the second integral as well.

Yes, in both cases you must integrate up to k_F only (the k value at the Fermi energy).
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
773
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K