I Fermi energy for a Fermion gas with a multiplicity function ##g_n##

phos19
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Fermi energy for arbitrary multiplicity
I ran across the following problem :

Statement:

Consider a gas of ## N ## fermions and suppose that each energy level ## \varepsilon_n## has a multiplicity of ## g_n = (n+1)^2 ##. What is the Fermi energy and the average energy of this gas when ## N \rightarrow \infty## ?

My attempt:

The average occupation number for a state of the ##n##th level is:

$$\langle N_n \rangle = \dfrac{1}{ e^{\beta(\varepsilon_n + \mu)} + 1 }$$

Usually if the system has a fixed degeneracy, say only the spin degeneracy ##g = 2s +1## , one can write the total number of particles ##N## as an integral over ##\vec{p}##:

$$
N = \sum_n \langle N_n \rangle = \dfrac{gV}{h^3} \int d^3 p \ \dfrac{1}{ e^{\beta(\varepsilon_p + \mu)} + 1 }
$$

One can than find the Fermi energy in the limit ##T \rightarrow 0##.

But this is not the case when ##g = g(n)##... Any hints on how to do this ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The generic equation for the total number of fermions is
$$
N = \int_0^\infty f(\varepsilon) D(\varepsilon) d\varepsilon
$$
where
$$
f(\varepsilon) = \frac{1}{e^{\beta(\varepsilon + \mu)} + 1}
$$
is the Fermi-Dirac distribution and ##D(\varepsilon)## is the density of states. The degeneracy factor ##g## is part of the density of states, so it will stay inside the integral if is dependent on ##n## (so dependent on ##\varepsilon##).

You should however be looking at the equation for the average energy. In the limit ##N \rightarrow \infty##, the energy levels can be considered continuous and an integral similar to the one above is obtained.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top