Fermi Gas Model / Fermi energy and momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of Fermi momentum (Kf) and Fermi energy (Ef) in the context of the Fermi Gas Model, specifically referencing Wong and Feshbach/deShalit. The calculated Fermi momentum is Kf = 1.3 fm-1, leading to a theoretical Fermi energy of Ef = 37 MeV using the formula Ef = (ħKf)2/2M, where M is the nucleon mass. However, a participant, Mike, encounters a discrepancy, calculating Ef to be approximately 11.2 MeV, suggesting a potential mathematical error or a missing geometrical adjustment in the Kf value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fermi Gas Model
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly Fermi energy
  • Knowledge of nucleon mass and its significance in calculations
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of physical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Fermi energy in quantum mechanics
  • Study the implications of geometrical factors in Fermi momentum calculations
  • Explore the relationship between nucleon mass and energy calculations
  • Investigate common mathematical errors in physics calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and nuclear physics, as well as anyone involved in calculations related to the Fermi Gas Model.

mmisk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Hope somebody can help - I seem to be missing the obvious and bonking
my head on the wall.

In Wong and also in Feshbach/deShalit, they calculate the Fermi momentum,
Kf using the experimental value of Rho-0 and come up with Kf=1.3 fm-1

So far so good.

Where I stumble is in their calculation of the Fermi Energy, Ef. For
instance, Wong has Ef=(hbar*Kf)^2/2M, M=nucleon mass, giving
Ef about 37 Mev. But when I plug in the appropriate values I get an
Ef of 11.2 ish Mev with M = M neutron ~939.5 Mev/c^2.

I'm sure I'm missing the obvious 'adjustment' to the privously
calculated Kf, and suspect it is a geometrical consideration as I'm
off roughly pi.

Thanks

Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
er..ah.. stupid math error

multiplying by 1.xx ^ +15 and dividing by 1.xx ^ -15 give answers to same order of magnitude...just that one is 11.7 and the other is 37 :bugeye: I've been wearing my dunce hat for a few days now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K