Calculate velocity of the fastest neutron inside a 96Mo nucl

In summary: However, if you are writing a paper for publication, you should ask a specialist in the field to check it for you.In summary, the calculation of the Fermi energy for a 96Mo nucleus results in a velocity of 0.2547 times the speed of light for the fastest neutron. This raises the question of whether or not it is safe to consider such nucleons in a non-relativistic way. While the Lorentz factor of 1.03 suggests that relativity may need to be taken into account, the fact that the neutron's energy is not close to its rest mass may indicate that it is not necessary. However, it is recommended to consult a specialist in the field for further clarification, especially if writing
  • #1
says
594
12

Homework Statement


Calculate the velocity of the fastest neutron in a 96Mo nucleus and, based on this, explain whether or not we are safe to consider such nucleons in a non-relativistic way. Hint: first
calculate the Fermi energy.

Homework Equations


Fermi energy from Fermi gas model: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_gas

The Attempt at a Solution


Calculating the Fermi energy using Wolfram:
http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(hbar^2/(2*1.674929*10^-27kg))((3*pi^2((6*10^43)))/1m^3)^(2/3)

Fermi Energy = 30.3946 MeV

Fermi Momentum = √(2mE)
m: mass of neutron
E: Fermi energy

Fermi Momentum = √(2*939.565*30.3946) = 238.988 MeV/c

Velocity = Fermi Momentum / mass
= 238.988 MeV/c / 939.565Mev/c^2
= 0.2547c

So the fastest neutron in 96Mo is traveling at .2547 * speed of light. Provided my calculation is correct, I'm not sure whether we are safe to calculate them in a non-relativistic way though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
says said:
the fastest neutron in 96Mo is traveling at .2547 * speed of light. Provided my calculation is correct, I'm not sure whether we are safe to calculate them in a non-relativistic way though?
Ultimately it depends on what you are going to calculate and how accurately you need the answer. What does it give for the Lorenz factor? That might be a clue.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_speed
 
  • #4
says said:
I calculated the lorentz factor and got 1.03. I'm not sure if this means we are safe to consider the neutrons as non-relativistic though.

http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/sqrt(1-(0.2547^2/1^2))
Yes, that's what I got. Borderline, I'd say. I can only repeat, it depends what question you are trying to answer, which perhaps says it is not safe to ignore it.
 
  • #5
When you say 'borderline' what do you mean?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_gas#Relativistic_Fermi_gas

This says "For particles with energies close to their respective rest mass we have to use the equations of special relativity"

Considering the neutrons fermi energy is 30.3946 MeV and it's rest mass is 939.565Mev/c2 we could say its energy isn't close to it's rest mass.
 
  • #6
says said:
"For particles with energies close to their respective rest mass we have to use the equations of special relativity"
Yes, that is certainly true. But it doesn't say that at only 3% it is safe not to. I'm really not sure.
If I had to gamble, I would opt for saying you do not need to consider relativity.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top