Feynman diagram for sigma+ -> n + pi+

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on drawing a Feynman diagram for the decay process sigma+ -> neutron + pi+, specifically at the quark level. The decay involves the transformation of the quark content from uus to udd + udbar, necessitating the inclusion of a W- boson and potentially a Z boson or gamma photon in the diagram. Participants confirm the validity of the proposed diagram while emphasizing the importance of methodical approaches in particle physics illustrations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams
  • Knowledge of particle decay processes
  • Familiarity with quark content and transformations
  • Basic concepts of bosons, specifically W- and Z bosons
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of W- and Z bosons in particle interactions
  • Learn about quark flavor changes and their implications in particle physics
  • Explore advanced Feynman diagram techniques for complex decay processes
  • Review particle physics textbooks for systematic approaches to diagram drawing
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of particle physics, particularly those interested in decay processes and Feynman diagram representation.

makehhh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I am trying to draw a Feynman Diagram at quark level for the decay sigma+ -> neutron + pi+.

Homework Equations



sigma+ -> neutron + pi+
uus -> udd + udbar

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the attachment is what I came up with. I have no idea if it's right to be honest, I can't see anything wrong with it, but I have no idea how to be methodical about these kinds of drawings, and haven't found any particle physics texts to be much help.

Thanks for your help!
 

Attachments

  • sigma+ to proton pi+.JPG
    sigma+ to proton pi+.JPG
    5.4 KB · Views: 1,721
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I can't see your diagram yet, but I think the diagram requires both a W- boson and a Z boson in it.
 
Last edited:
At least a W- and then a Z or a gamma.
 
So I think your diagram looks OK, but maybe someone else would like to confirm it.
 
My alternative was:
 

Attachments

  • feynman.png
    feynman.png
    954 bytes · Views: 951
Ah, yes that looks good, thanks for your help guys, much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K