Feynman Diagram of Neutron-Antineutron reaction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a neutron-antineutron reaction resulting in the production of three pions. Participants are exploring the underlying forces involved in this process and the appropriate representation through Feynman diagrams.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the possibility of the reaction and expresses confusion regarding the absence of vertices in their Feynman diagram. Some participants suggest comparing this interaction to known nuclear interactions, while others emphasize the need for additional gluon interactions to accurately depict the process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some offering guidance on exploring existing literature and examples. There is an acknowledgment of the need for further understanding of inter-nucleon interactions, and the discussion is progressing towards clarifying the role of gluons in the Feynman diagram.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's limited exposure to other diagrams of nucleon interactions, which may impact their ability to draw parallels or fully grasp the complexities of the reaction in question.

JamesM86
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the following reaction possible? If so, by what force? Draw (one of, if applicable)the lowest order Feynman diagrams for the process.

n + n-bar --> ∏+ + ∏- + ∏0

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



This process, it seems to me, should be possible. It doesn't violate conservation of energy, charge, or baryon number. However, when I draw the feynmann diagram, I notice something odd.

It is apparently possible to simply rearrange the quarks and antiquarks of the neutron and antineutron into the three pi mesons, without actually making any vertices in the diagram. This would suggest that the process isn't actually mediated by any kind of force...

This can't be right, and I'm quite confused. Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a nuclear interaction - try comparing with the other diagrams you have for interactions between nucleons.
 
I don't "have" any other such diagrams. We have discussed this sort of interaction in detail yet.
 
Ah - in which case you'd want to look for some online.
You really need to spend some time on ordinary inter-nucleon interactions before you deal with something like this.

Wikipedia has some examples in it's entry on the strong nuclear interaction.
 
That wikipedia article does have the feynman diagram for the stron interaction between a proton and a neutron. I have seen it before.

So in this diagram I'm drawing, do I need to just add gluons and interactions? My reservation is that I'm supposed to be drawing the lowest order diagrams that I can draw, and so I don't understand why I need to arbitrarily add gluon vertices, or where exactly it would be legitimate to do so.
 
Take a look at the animation further down - it shows you why you need the extra gluon interactions. You have to work out how the quarks could get resorted into pions - why not just stay in their neutrons? The simplest possible Feynman diagram, after all, is the one where the particles just pass each other without interacting. Something extra has to be happening.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K