Feynman Diagrams, are these allowed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the legality of Feynman diagrams presented by a user, with two possible interpretations for each diagram. Key rules mentioned include prioritizing strong interactions over electromagnetic and weak interactions, as well as favoring tree-level diagrams over loop diagrams. It is noted that one diagram is less relevant unless near the Z energy level during collisions, and another diagram contains extra particles that should not be included. Suggestions are made to improve the diagrams, such as using a photon in one case and flipping the right-hand side of another to address charge issues. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of adhering to established rules in particle physics when creating Feynman diagrams.
NumberBucket
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I have drawn a couple of diagrams for each of the two following equations. Are any of them wrong? Are either preferred? I don't have much practice with drawing these...
Relevant Equations
electron + positron -> tau+ anti-tau
electron + positron -> tau-neutrino + anti-tau-neutrino
Capture1.PNG


Capture2.PNG

These are my attempts, I have found two possibilities for each, but have no idea if they're 'legal'...

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As a rule of thumb: strong > electromagnetic > weak, and tree-level > loops
While the diagrams are possible (except for the signs in the second one, check these) there is a much more important diagram for tau+antitau unless you are close to the Z energy in the collision.
The fourth diagram has additional particles that shouldn't be there.
 
  • Like
Likes NumberBucket
mfb said:
As a rule of thumb: strong > electromagnetic > weak, and tree-level > loops
While the diagrams are possible (except for the signs in the second one, check these) there is a much more important diagram for tau+antitau unless you are close to the Z energy in the collision.
The fourth diagram has additional particles that shouldn't be there.
Ah ok, thanks! So would the first one be better with a photon then? And would flipping the RHS of the second one fix the charge issues?
 
"Better" is subjective. "Stronger" at low energies: Certainly.

Yes, flipping the RHS will fix it.
 
  • Like
Likes NumberBucket
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top