Feynman Diagrams: Uncovering the Issue

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the interpretation of Feynman diagrams in an IB Physics work packet. The primary issue arises from conflicting conventions regarding the direction of time in the diagrams, specifically whether they should be read left to right or down to up. The user highlights that reading the problem left to right results in an incorrect lepton number of -2 for the incoming exchange particle, while reading it down to up suggests a rare case of pair production. The discussion emphasizes the importance of adhering to established conventions for arrow directions in Feynman diagrams.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their conventions
  • Knowledge of lepton numbers and particle physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of pair production
  • Basic grasp of time flow in quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conventions for Feynman diagram arrow directions
  • Study the implications of lepton number conservation in particle interactions
  • Explore examples of pair production in particle physics
  • Learn about the historical context and development of Feynman diagrams
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, IB Physics students, and anyone interested in particle physics and the conventions of Feynman diagrams.

Cardinalmont
Gold Member
Messages
22
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I assigned a work packet to my IB Physics students that guides them through how to make Feynman diagrams. This particular problem seems to have some issue, but perhaps it is something that myself and my class have all over looked.

Note: At the beginning of the packet it states that some diagrams have time go left to right and others down to up.

The issue we have is that the problems shows it should be read left to right. If the problem is read left to right, then the lepton number of the incoming exchange particle would have to be -2.
If the problem is read down to up, then this could be a rare case of pair production.

What do you think? Help please!

Second Note: The direction of the arrows for antiparticles such us the antimuon are meant to go against the flow of time.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-11-12 at 3.04.06 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-11-12 at 3.04.06 PM.png
    12.4 KB · Views: 634
Physics news on Phys.org
Cardinalmont said:
If the problem is read left to right

It is labeled "before" and "after"

Cardinalmont said:
then the lepton number of the incoming exchange particle would have to be -2.

The arrows don't match the labels. "Against the flow of time" is nonsense. There is a convention for arrows; one cannot just pick another one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Both things that you addressed were things that I had already addressed in my original post and were not helpful. I stated that the problem was to be read from left to right, this is based on the label before and after. I also stated the convention for arrows in the second note of my post.

Maybe I was unclear. I did not create this work packet, nor did I create these conventions. I am just asking if this problem is definitely invalid
 
Let me repeat. There is a convention for arrows; one cannot just pick another one. This problem seems not to have followed the convention. There's no more that can really be said.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K