Feynman Factors & Relativistic Scalar Propagator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the Feynman factors and the derivation of the relativistic scalar propagator for scalar particles. The propagator is expressed as \(\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}-m^{2}}\), which results from summing all possible self-interactions characterized by the mass term \(-im^{2}\). The derivation involves using the identity \((1+x)^{-1}=1+x+x^{2}+x^{3}+\cdots\) with \(x=\frac{m^{2}}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}}\) to factorize the contributions from self-interactions. The discussion clarifies that the scalar interaction is indeed the sum of all self-interactions influenced by mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their components
  • Familiarity with relativistic quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of propagators in quantum field theory
  • Ability to manipulate mathematical identities and series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Feynman propagator in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of self-interactions in particle physics
  • Learn about the role of mass in quantum field theory and its effects on propagators
  • Investigate advanced quantum mechanics texts, particularly on self-interaction and propagators
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, students of advanced quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in particle interactions and propagators.

Sekonda
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hey again,

I have a question on a couple of things related to feynman diagrams but also the relativistic scalar propagator term.

First of all, this interaction:

feynman2.png


The cross represents a self-interaction via the mass and characterised by the term: -im^2, is this just some initial state then self-interacting with itself via the mass, with nothing changing and it entering into a final state the same as the initial state? Can anybody explain what exactly is happening in this interaction?

My second question is on the propagator for a relativisitc scalar particle, I believe it has form:

\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}-m^{2}}

My professor said that this is where this form comes from, he said to imagine summing up all the possible number of self-interaction from 0 self interactions to (presumably) and infinite number of interactions, so :

Self_Interaction_Sum.png


So the first line has no mass interaction so m=0 and the factor for the first one is :

\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}}

then the second line has one mass interaction so the factor associated with it is :

\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}}(-im^{2})\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}}

and the third line has 2 mass interactions and so the factor is :

(\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}})^3(-im^{2})^2

And so we sum all these factors up (to the maximum number of self-interactions) and can make factorisation below:

\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}}(1+\frac{m^{2}}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}}+\frac{m^{4}}{(E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2})^2}+\cdots )

We use identity:

(1+x)^{-1}=1+x+x^{2}+x^{3}+\cdots\: ,\: x=\frac{m^{2}}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}}

and thus obtain the relativistic scalar propagator:

\frac{i}{E^{2}-\mathbf{p}^{2}-m^{2}}

How does this work? Is the scalar interaction just the sum of all the self-interactions by mass?

Thanks,
SK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is rather different from what you think.the identity used is rather
1/x+y=1/x-(1/x)y(1/x)+(1/x)y(1/x)y(1/x)-...
the cross sign represents all self interaction summation and writing the modified propagator which is obtained simply by supplying the feynman rules for those interaction and summing them.Also mass change is simply identified by well known relation,
EdE=mdm,you can see page 284 here and forward for more on this
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=lvmSZkzDFt0C&pg=PA81&dq=advanced+quantum+mechanics+self+interaction&hl=en#v=onepage&q=advanced%20quantum%20mechanics%20self%20interaction&f=false
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
592
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
951