Graduate Feynman integral with three propagators

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around computing a Feynman integral with three propagators, where the user has introduced Feynman parameters and is attempting to simplify the integral. They express confusion about completing the square and shifting the integration variable according to Peskin and Schroeder's methods. Guidance is provided on collecting terms, specifically focusing on the delta function to consolidate the k-squared terms and mass terms. The user struggles with the correct form for completing the square and the subsequent variable shift. Ultimately, they seek clarification on how to effectively perform the integration variable shift after completing the square.
Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17
Hi guys,
So I'm trying to compute this Feynman integral:
$$ V=\dfrac {-i} {2} \int {\dfrac {d^4 k} {(2\pi)^4}} \dfrac {1} {k^2 - m^2} \dfrac {1} {(k+P_1)^2 -m^2} \dfrac {1} {(k+P_1 +P_2)^2 -m^2}$$
I have introduced the Feynman parameters and now have the integral:
$$ V=-i \int dx_1 \int dx_2 \int dx_3 \int {\dfrac {d^4 k} {(2\pi)^4}} \dfrac {\delta (1-x_1 -x_2 -x_3)} {-x_1 (k^2 - m^2) -x_2 ((k+P_1)^2 -m^2) -x_3 ((k+P_1 +P_2)^2 -m^2)}$$
Now focusing on the denominator I expand it out and need to complete the square and shift the integration variable according to Peskin Schroeder, but I'm not sure how to do this. Here is what I have so far:
$$ -x_1 k^2 -x_1 m^2 -x_2 k^2 -2x_2 k \cdot P_1 - x_2 P_1^2 -x_2 m^2 -x_3 k^2 -2 x_3 k \cdot P_1 -2 x_3 k \cdot P_2 - x_3 P_1 ^2 -x_3 P_2 ^2 -2x_3 P_1 \cdot P_2 -x_3 m^2 $$

I know that I need to get rid of the terms with dot products but I'm not sure how, any guidance would be awesome :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, use the ##\delta## to collect all of the ##k^2## terms into a single one with the prefactor 1. Second, collect all of the terms with an inner product with ##k## and write it on the form ##2k\cdot V##, where ##V## is some sum of 4-vectors. Finally, complete the square.
 
Hi,
Thanks for your response :) I'm not sure exactly what you mean by using the delta to collect the k squared terms?
 
Because of the delta function, ##x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 1## whenever the integrand is non-zero.
 
Oh ok thanks, so I also do that for the mass terms as well. Now I have:
$$= -k^2 - 2k\cdot (x_2 P_1 +x_3 P_1 +x_3 P_2) - 2 x_3 P_1 \cdot P_2 -m^2 $$
Now to complete the square I must be making some mistake, I get this:
$$= (-k^2 - 2k\cdot (x_2 P_1 +x_3 P_1 +x_3 P_2) +(x_2 P_1 +x_3 P_1 +x_3 P_2)^2) - 2 x_3 P_1 \cdot P_2 - (x_2 P_1 +x_3 P_1 +x_3 P_2)^2 -m^2 $$
This doesn't appear to help me though..
 
You should have the opposite sign for the last term in the completed square. Once you have completed the square, you can make the variable shift.
 
Ah yes, thanks :) so would the appropriate momentum shift be:
$$ l = k+ x_2 P_1 + x_3 P_1 + x_3 P_2 $$
I'm not at all clear on how to shift the integration variable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
692
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K