Feynman Lectures: The Random Walk Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter luuurey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Random walk
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the complexities of understanding the chapter "The Random Walk" from the Feynman Lectures on Physics, specifically around equations 41.18 and 41.19. The user expresses confusion regarding the implications of the average values \left\langle x v_x \right\rangle and \left\langle x F_x \right\rangle, particularly in relation to particle behavior in a gas and the effects of resistance. A suggestion is made to read the Feynman Lectures alongside more contemporary texts for better comprehension, as they serve as a refresher for those already familiar with basic physics concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, particularly in physics contexts.
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics and the concept of random walks.
  • Knowledge of average values in physics, specifically and .
  • Basic grasp of forces and resistance in physical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of and in statistical mechanics.
  • Explore contemporary texts on random walks and their applications in physics.
  • Learn about the role of resistance in forced motion through differential equations.
  • Review the concept of memoryless processes in physics and their relation to averages.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators seeking to clarify complex concepts, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of random walks and their implications in physical systems.

luuurey
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
There is a chapter in Feynman Lectures on Physics called The Random Walk(41-4). I understand everything till the paragraph right after equation 41.18. I have no idea what he is trying to say. There is an equation 41.19, which is diff. eq. for object that is forced and is in a environment that causes resistance... that is not eq. of particle in a gas. Than he is saying that average of \left\langle x v_x \right\rangle does not change because it doesn't remember where it was before.. I don't understand that formulation. I am also not sure why \left\langle x F_x \right\rangle = 0.

Could someone help me please ?
Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Feynman lectures were not very effective when Feynman was giving them - they tend to the over-clever - I don't think they are that great now. You are best advised to read them alongside or after a more contemporary text... they tend to work best as a refresher course for people who have already done the basic physics by another method.

However, your questions can be approached by considering the converse. i.e. what does it mean for <xF> not zero, and <xv> not constant? What do xv and xF measure?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K