Fidelity for quantum state at t=0

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of fidelity for quantum states at time t=0, specifically comparing an initial pure state to a final state expressed in terms of a parameter t. Participants explore the mathematical expressions for fidelity and the implications of their calculations, addressing potential errors and misunderstandings in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that fidelity for a pure state at t=0 should be 1, as stated by their teacher, but expresses confusion over their own calculation yielding a different result.
  • Another participant suggests that the statement about fidelity being 1 is meaningless without context, proposing that fidelity is measured with respect to the initial state.
  • A participant indicates that if a specific factor in the fidelity calculation were positive instead of negative, it would yield fidelity of 1 at t=0, prompting a check of signs in calculations.
  • Several participants request to see detailed calculations to identify potential errors in the fidelity computation.
  • One participant questions the order of the kets in the final state, suggesting that taking t=0 should recover the initial state.
  • Another participant reports that changing the order of the kets still results in the same fidelity, indicating a possible misunderstanding or error elsewhere.
  • After further calculations, one participant claims to have found fidelity equal to 1 upon substituting t=0, raising questions about the correctness of their substitution.
  • Concerns are raised about the ability to spot errors in both editing and calculations, with some participants emphasizing the importance of self-correction and understanding in mathematical reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the fidelity calculation, with no consensus reached on the correct interpretation or outcome. Some participants agree on the need for detailed calculations to clarify misunderstandings, while others remain uncertain about the fidelity results.

Contextual Notes

Participants' calculations depend on specific assumptions about the states involved and the mathematical expressions used. There are unresolved issues regarding the signs in the fidelity formula and the order of the kets, which may affect the final results.

deepalakshmi
Messages
95
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Fidelity for same pure quantum state
fidelity for pure state with respect to t=0 is 1. My teacher told me this.
But I am not getting this.
This is my detailed question
the initial state(t=0)##|\psi\rangle=|\alpha\rangle|0\rangle##
the final state (t) ##|\chi\rangle= |i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle|cos(t)\alpha\rangle##
Fidelity between the states I got is ##e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}##
when I tried to find fidelity for t=0, I got answer as 0.00004. But my teacher said that fidelity should be 1 here. I don't know how?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fidelity is the "distance" between two quantum states, so the statement
deepalakshmi said:
fidelity for pure state at t=0 is 1
is meaningless by itself. My guess is that fidelity is being measured here with respect to the initial (t=0) state.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
DrClaude said:
Fidelity is the "distance" between two quantum states, so the statement

is meaningless by itself. My guess is that fidelity is being measured here with respect to the initial (t=0) state.
I have edited the question
 
deepalakshmi said:
Fidelity between the states I got is ##e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}##
If the third factor was ##e^{+|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}##, then you would get fidelity 1 at ##t=0##. So check your signs!
 
No, the last factor is -(minus)
Here I have attached my calculation for your reference
##F=|\rangle\psi|\chi\rangle|^{2}##
the initial state(t=0)##|\psi\rangle=|\alpha\rangle|0\rangle##

the final state (t) ##|\chi\rangle= |i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle|cos(t)\alpha\rangle##
##F=|\langle|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle|^{2}##
On simplifying##\langle\alpha|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle##, I will get ##e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}e^{{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}/2}e^{-|\alpha|^2sin(t)}##
Similarly on simplifying ##\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle##, I will get ##e^{{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}/2}##
so finally my fidelity will be ##e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}##
 
deepalakshmi said:
Here I have attached my calculation
That's not the calculation, that's just your results, so I cannot tell you where exactly is your error.
 
Demystifier said:
That's not the calculation, that's just your results, so I cannot tell you where exactly is your error.
Ok I will attach my detailed calculation on cos term alone
 
I'm only doing math in my head, but are you sure you have the order of the kets correct in the final state? I would think you'd be able to just take ##t=0## in ##\chi## and recover the initial state.
 
even if I change the final state order, I am still getting the same fidelity
 
  • #10
In that case, I'm with @Demystifier. We will need to see your calculations to know what's going wrong. Because if you switch the order of the kets and take ##t=0##, then you get exactly the initial state.
 
  • #11
My detailed calculation
##F=|\langle\psi|\chi\rangle|^{2}##
the initial state(t=0)##|\psi\rangle=|\alpha\rangle|0\rangle##

the final state (t) ##|\chi\rangle= |i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle|\cos(t)\alpha\rangle##
##F=|\langle|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle|^{2}##
On simplifying##\langle\alpha|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle##
##\langle\alpha|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle##

$$=e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha*)^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \langle n| e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}\sum_m{ \frac{(\alpha i \sin(t))^m}{\sqrt{m!}}| m\rangle$$

##= (e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}\sum_n\sum_m{ \frac{(\alpha*)^n}{(\alpha i \sin(t))^m}{\sqrt{n!m!}} \langle n|m\rangle##

$$=(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha*\alpha i \sin(t))^n}{\sqrt{n!}}$$

##e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}e^{{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}##

on simplifying ##\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle ##

##\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle##
=##\langle0|(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha\cos(t))^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \langle n|##

=(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha\cos(t))^n}{\sqrt{n!}}\langle 0|n\rangle

= e^{{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}/2}

putting both the simplified equation on F

$$F=|(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2})e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}e^{{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}e^{{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}/2}|^{2}$$

$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}e^{{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}e^{-{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}$$

So finally my fidelity will be $$e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}$$
 
Last edited:
  • #12
deepalakshmi said:
My detailed calculation
##F=|\rangle\psi|\chi\rangle|^{2}##
the initial state(t=0)##|\psi\rangle=|\alpha\rangle|0\rangle##

the final state (t) ##|\chi\rangle= |i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle|\cos(t)\alpha\rangle##
F=##|\langle|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle|^{2}##
On simplifying##\langle\alpha|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle##
##\langle\alpha|i\alpha\sin(t)\rangle##=##(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha*)^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \langle n|)(e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}\sum_m{ \frac{(\alpha i \sin(t))^m}{\sqrt{m!}}| m\rangle##
##=(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}\sum_n\sum_m{ \frac{(\alpha*)^n}{(\alpha i \sin(t))^m}{\sqrt{n!m!}} \langle n|m\rangle##
= ##(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha*\alpha i \sin(t))^n}{\sqrt{n!}}##
=##(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}e^{{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}##
on simplifying ##\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle##
##\langle0|\alpha\cos(t)\rangle##=##\langle0|(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha\cos(t))^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \langle n|##
=##(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2}\sum_n{ \frac{(\alpha\cos(t))^n}{\sqrt{n!}}\langle 0|n\rangle##
= ##e^{{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}/2}##
putting both the simplified equation on F
##F=|(e^{{-|\alpha|^2}/2})e^{{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}/2}e^{{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}e^{{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}/2}|^{2}##
##=e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha \sin(t)|^2}e^{{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}e^{-{i|\alpha|^2}sin(t)}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}##
##=e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}##
Can someone edit this? I need help. I am trying to edit, but i can't
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Haborix
  • #13
Pls help with editing. It is taking more than 1 hour for me. Still I can't properly edit it
 
  • #14
@Demystifier @Haborix I have sent my full calculation. I am sure there is no mistake in it. But why am I not getting 1 when I substitute with t=0?
 
  • #15
Haborix said:
I'm only doing math in my head, but are you sure you have the order of the kets correct in the final state? I would think you'd be able to just take ##t=0## in ##\chi## and recover the initial state.
As you have said, I changed the order of ket, I got the following fidelity
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}|e^{|\alpha|^2cos(t)}|^2 e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}e^{|\alpha|^4cos^2(t)}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{-(|\alpha|^2cos^2(t))+|\alpha|^4cos^2(t)} e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{|\alpha|^2cos^2(t)}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
Now if I substitute t=0, I am getting F=1.
Is my substitution correct?(mainly 4th equation)
 
  • #16
deepalakshmi said:
I am sure there is no mistake in it.
If you make errors in editing that you don't see, how can you be sure that you don't make errors in computation that you don't see?
 
  • #17
Demystifier said:
If you make errors in editing that you don't see, how can you be sure that you don't make errors in computation that you don't see?
Yes. I am wrong
 
  • #18
deepalakshmi said:
Can someone edit this? I need help. I am trying to edit, but i can't
I could do that but I will not, for didactic reasons. You have to train your mind to spot all the tiny errors that you make, both in editing and in calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: deepalakshmi
  • #19
Demystifier said:
I could do that but I will not, for didactic reasons. You have to train your mind to spot all the tiny errors that you make, both in editing and in calculations.
Ok. Thanks.
 
  • #20
deepalakshmi said:
As you have said, I changed the order of ket, I got the following fidelity
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}|e^{|\alpha|^2cos(t)}|^2 e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}e^{|\alpha|^4cos^2(t)}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{-(|\alpha|^2cos^2(t))+|\alpha|^4cos^2(t)} e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{|\alpha|^2cos^2(t)}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
Now if I substitute t=0, I am getting F=1.
Is my substitution correct?(mainly 4th equation)
Your substitution of ##t=0## looks fine, but you make an algebra error moving from the first to second line. Maybe you corrected the mistake later.
 
  • #21
Haborix said:
Your substitution of ##t=0## looks fine, but you make an algebra error moving from the first to second line. Maybe you corrected the mistake later.
Can you point that algebra error? And what is ##|e^{|\alpha|^2cos(t)}|^2##?
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Haborix said:
Your substitution of ##t=0## looks fine, but you make an algebra error moving from the first to second line. Maybe you corrected the mistake later.
$$F=e^{-|\alpha|^2}e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}|e^{|\alpha|^2cos(t)}|^2 e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$=e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{-|\alpha\cos(t)|^2}e^{|\alpha|^2cos(t)}e^{|\alpha|^2cos(t)}e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$
$$ =e^{-|\alpha|^2} e^{-|\alpha|^2cos^2(t)}e^{2|\alpha|^2cos(t)} e^{-|\alpha\sin(t)|^2}$$Is it correct now?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haborix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K