Find 12th Term in Simple Sequence: 1,4,9,16...

  • Thread starter Thread starter ila
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The 12th term of the sequence 1, 4, 9, 16... is definitively 144, as each term corresponds to the square of its position in the sequence (n^2). The discussion highlights that while alternative algorithms can generate the same initial terms, the underlying pattern is that each term is the sum of consecutive odd numbers. This relationship is mathematically proven, establishing that the nth term can be expressed as the sum of the first n odd numbers, which equals n^2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical sequences and series
  • Familiarity with the concept of perfect squares
  • Knowledge of summation notation and basic algebra
  • Ability to recognize patterns in numerical sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of perfect squares and their derivations
  • Explore the relationship between odd numbers and square numbers
  • Learn about mathematical induction to prove sequences
  • Investigate other types of numerical sequences and their generating functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory or sequence analysis will benefit from this discussion.

ila
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If there is a sequence of numbers 1,4,9,16... what is the 12th term in the sequence (where 1 is the first term). The textbook says that it is 144 since each term of the sequence is the square of the term value. I find (and have always found) this to be confusing, why can't an alternate algorithm generate those few numbers, namely add 3 for the first term, five to the second term, 7 to the second term. Now there there appears to me an obvious pattern, the amount that one is adding to each term is increasing by 2 in the number of terms. I still haven't figured out an expression for the nth term for this alternative though. The general point though is this, with these sequences if we have given only a few numbers why can't we propose many different algorithms and then suggest that that is the correct generating process?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. There are uncountably many integer sequences that continue the partial sequence you were given.
2. Your sequence happens to be the same as your teacher's: the squares are the sum of consecutive odd numbers!
 
You are certainly correct that there are other algorithms that would generate this same sequence for the first few terms. So strictly speaking the next number could be anything. Ironically though if you continue you the sequence with your pattern you will arrive at exactly the same sequence the book does, namely the perfect squares. And it is not too terribly difficult to prove this fact, that the sum of the first n odd numbers is n^2.
 
d_leet said:
Ironically though if you continue you the sequence with your pattern you will arrive at exactly the same sequence the book does, namely the perfect squares. And it is not too terribly difficult to prove this fact, that the sum of the first n odd numbers is n^2.
I had a sinking suspicion that that may have been the case.
 
All you have to do is see that n^2 = ((n-1) +1)^2 = (n-1)^2+2(n-1)+1 = (n-1)^2 + (2n-1). So that, 1, 1+3=4, 4+5=9, 9+7= 16. So that each term increases by the next odd number, and is a square.

Thus the nth term is \sum_1^n (2j-1)=n^2.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
81K