Find a function of velocity relative to x

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the velocity function relative to position (v(x)) and the position function relative to time (x(t)) for an object moving along the x-axis under the influence of a force defined by Fx = -mω²x. The user initially attempted to find v(x) using acceleration a(x) = -ω²x and integrating, but encountered confusion with the resulting expression v(x) = √(-1)ωx. For x(t), the user derived v(t) = -ω²xt and subsequently attempted to integrate to find x(t), resulting in x(t) = (-ω²xt²)/2 + x₀, but expressed uncertainty about the correctness of both parts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically Newton's second law.
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration and differentiation techniques.
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus.
  • Basic understanding of harmonic motion concepts related to forces and acceleration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of velocity and position functions in harmonic motion.
  • Learn about the application of the chain rule in physics problems.
  • Explore the concept of exact differentials in calculus.
  • Review the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of motion under force in one-dimensional systems.

etchzel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object is moving in x-axis with given force [itex]Fx = -mω^{2}x[/itex], where ω is a positive constant. when t = 0 the object starts moving from point [itex]x_{0} > 0[/itex].
a. Find the object's velocity function relative to x ([itex]v(x)[/itex])
b. Find the object's position function relative to t ([itex]x(t)[/itex])

Help: [itex]\int\frac{dz}{\sqrt{A^{2} - z^{2}}}[/itex] perform the integration by changing z = A cos u
(I don't know what this help thing for though, I find it irrelevant to the question :confused: )


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a. First, using the above-mentioned force equation, I found the acceleration function relative to x, it goes like:

[itex]Fx = -mω^{2}x[/itex]
[itex]ma(x) = -mω^{2}x[/itex]
[itex]a(x) = -ω^{2}x[/itex]​

then, since [itex]a(x) = \frac{v(x)}{dt}[/itex], by using chain rule, it goes:

[itex]a(x) = \frac{v(x)}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex]
[itex]a(x) dx = v(t) dv(x)[/itex]​

assuming that v(t) = v(x) (even though the function might be different, the result will be the same either way) then:

[itex]a(x) dx = v(x) dv(x)[/itex]
[itex]\int a(x) dx = \int v(x) dv(x)[/itex]
[itex]-\frac{1}{2}ω^{2}x^{2} + C = \frac{v(x)^{2}}{2} + C[/itex]
[itex]v(x) = \sqrt{-1}ωx[/itex]​

there goes my attempt for part a, and I'm not even sure if it was correct, that [itex]\sqrt{-1}[/itex] part is throwing me off :rolleyes:

for part b, my last-moment attempt goes like this:

[itex]v(t) = \int a(x) dt[/itex]
[itex]v(t) = -ω^{2}xt + C[/itex]​

when t = 0, the object is at rest, then v(0) = 0, and when t = 0, [itex]x = x_{0}[/itex]

[itex]0 = -ω^{2}x_{0}(0) + C ==> C = 0[/itex]
[itex]v(t) = -ω^{2}xt[/itex]​

then using integral to find x(t):

[itex]x(t) = \int v(t) dt[/itex]
[itex]x(t) = \frac{-ω^{2}x_{0}t^{2}}{2} + C[/itex]​

when t = 0,

[itex]x_{0} = \frac{-ω^{2}x_{0}(0)^{2}}{2} + C ==> C = 0[/itex]
[itex]x(t) = \frac{-ω^{2}xt^{2}}{2} + x_{0}[/itex]​

-----------------------------

pretty sure I was wrong for part b :s
can someone give me a hint on how to solve this problem?
any help is much appreciated, thanks! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

etchzel said:
then, since [itex]a(x) = \frac{v(x)}{dt}[/itex], by using chain rule, it goes:

[itex]a(x) = \frac{v(x)}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex]
[itex]a(x) dx = v(t) dv(x)[/itex]​

What exactly are you doing? I'm afraid this is nonsense. The acceleration is the time derivative of the velocity. So, it is:$$a(x) = \frac{dv(x)}{dt}$$and so by the chain rule:$$a(x) = \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt} = v\frac{dv}{dx}$$
 
Now thing to do is to look at the right hand side of that last equation, and notice that it looks like something that *has already been* differentiated with respect to x using the chain rule. So, can you reverse that step, thus turn the right hand side into an exact derivative of something? I.e., right hand side can be expressed as ##\frac{d}{dx}[\textrm{blah}]##, and you have to figure out what "blah" is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K