Find all x such that |x-1|+|x-2|>1.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding all values of x such that the expression |x-1| + |x-2| is greater than 1. This falls under the subject area of inequalities and absolute value functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss a case-wise approach to solving the inequality, examining different scenarios based on the values of x relative to 1 and 2. There is confusion regarding the validity of certain cases, particularly where the assumptions lead to nonsensical results.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the implications of the cases, noting that certain assumptions do not yield useful information. There is an ongoing exploration of the cases, with participants questioning the validity of their reasoning and the intersections of their assumptions with the solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of correctly interpreting the cases and the need to discard those that do not make sense. There is also mention of the potential benefit of visualizing the function to gain further insight into the problem.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Find all x such that ##|x-1|+|x-2|>1##.

Homework Equations



Definition of absolute value:
|x| = x if x ≥ 0.
|x| = -x if x ≤ 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured the most straightforward way if to do this case-wise:

Case 1: ##(x-1)>0 \wedge (x-2)>0## then

##(x-1) + (x-2) > 1 \implies x > 2.##


Case 2: ##(x-1)<0 \wedge (x-2)<0## then

## (1-x) + (2-x) > 1 \implies x<2.##


Case 3: ##(x-1)>0 \wedge (x-2)<0## then

## (x-1)+(1-x) > 1 \implies 0 >1. ##


Case 4: ##(x-1)<0 \wedge (x-2)>0## then

## (1-x) + (x+2) > 1 \implies 3 > 1. ##


Cases 3 and 4 are bothering me because x 'drops out.' Case 3 makes no sense and has me wondering if Case 4 even makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Case 1 looks right to me. Plugging 2 in you get |2-1|+|2-2|>1 ==> 1+0>1 so x has to be at least bigger than 2.
 
Yeah. I don't really understand what is going on with the other cases. Even case 2 fails if you plug in x = 1. I thought I needed to evaluate all cases and then take what is common between them?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Yeah. I don't really understand what is going on with the other cases. Even case 2 fails if you plug in x = 1. I thought I needed to evaluate all cases and then take what is common between them?

You need to intersect your assumptions with the solution. Take case 2. You've assumed x<1 AND x<2 AND you have concluded x<2. Of course, x=1 doesn't need to work. It violates your assumption that x<1.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
You need to intersect your assumptions with the solution. Take case 2. You've assumed x<1 AND x<2 AND you have concluded x<2. Of course, x=1 doesn't work. It violates your assumption that x<1.

Oof. Ok, I see that one now. Now what about case 3 and 4? Do they actually give me any useful information? I guess I need to take a second look here and do what you said.

Case 3 I assumed ##(x-1 > 0) \wedge (x-2 < 0)## which translates to ## x>1 \wedge x<2##. So this means that I am only looking at numbers on the interval (1,2). So does the fact that I got a 'nonsense' answer of 0>1 mean that there are no numbers on the interval (1,2) that satisfy the inequality?

And as for case 4, it seems I have assumed that ##x < 1 \wedge x>2## which is nonsense from the start! So it means that I need not consider this case (because it is not even a case!). Correct?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Oof. Ok, I see that one now. Now what about case 3 and 4? Do they actually give me any useful information? I guess I need to take a second look here and do what you said.

Case 3 I assumed ##(x-1 > 0) \wedge (x-2 < 0)## which translates to ## x>1 \wedge x<2##. So this means that I am only looking at numbers on the interval (1,2). So does the fact that I got a 'nonsense' answer of 0>1 mean that there are no numbers on the interval (1,2) that satisfy the inequality?

That's exactly what it means.
 
Dick said:
That's exactly what it means.

Don't know if you saw the edit about case 4, but I think I got it right. Thanks again Dick! I know you're sick of seeing my posts, but I promise there are plenty more to come. :smile: High school drop-outs turned engineers need to relearn math right sometimes :biggrin:
 
Saladsamurai said:
Don't know if you saw the edit about case 4, but I think I got it right. Thanks again Dick! I know you're sick of seeing my posts, but I promise there are plenty more to come. :smile: High school drop-outs turned engineers need to relearn math right sometimes :biggrin:

When I'm sick of hearing from you I'll stop answering your posts. Until then, you are fine. And yes, you are correct that some of the cases are nonsense. Just throw them away.
 
Saladsamurai said:

Homework Statement



Find all x such that ##|x-1|+|x-2|>1##.

Homework Equations



Definition of absolute value:
|x| = x if x ≥ 0.
|x| = -x if x ≤ 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured the most straightforward way if to do this case-wise:

Case 1: ##(x-1)>0 \wedge (x-2)>0## then

##(x-1) + (x-2) > 1 \implies x > 2.##


Case 2: ##(x-1)<0 \wedge (x-2)<0## then

## (1-x) + (2-x) > 1 \implies x<2.##


Case 3: ##(x-1)>0 \wedge (x-2)<0## then

## (x-1)+(1-x) > 1 \implies 0 >1. ##


Case 4: ##(x-1)<0 \wedge (x-2)>0## then

## (1-x) + (x+2) > 1 \implies 3 > 1. ##


Cases 3 and 4 are bothering me because x 'drops out.' Case 3 makes no sense and has me wondering if Case 4 even makes sense.

You may gain more insight by plotting the function f(x) = |x-1| + |x-2|. Think of adding the graph of y = |x-1| to the graph of y = |x-2|. Look in detail: when x is to the left of 1, both graphs have slope -1, so the combined graph has slope -2. For x between 1 and 2, one graph has slope -1 and the other has slope +1, so the combined slope = 0 (that is, f(x) is constant for 1 < x < 2). To the right of x = 2, both graphs have slope +1, so the combined graph has slope +2.

RGV
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K