Find arcsine(-2) using the rectangular representation of sin w

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
15 replies · 2K views
richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find [itex]\sin^{-1}(-2)[/itex] by writing [tex]sin w = -2[/itex] and using the rectangular representation of [itex]\sin w[/itex]<br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> Rectangular representation of [itex]\sin w[/itex]<br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> <br /> I think my biggest problem here is I have literally no idea what the "rectangular representation of [itex]\sin w[/itex] is. <br /> <br /> My textbook has this formula [itex]sin(x)=\sin(x)\cosh(y)+i\cos(x)\sinh(y)[/itex]. Other than that, I am sure where to start here really. I can get the answer using the formula for arcsin, but not from starting with sin...[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rectangular representation means z=x+iy for the complex number z.

sin-1(w) is a complex number, sin-1(w)=z=x+iy.

sin(sin-1(w))=w=-2.


The complex Sine function is defined as sin(z)=(eiz-e-iz)/(2i) = sin(x) cosh(y) +i cos(x) sinh(y).

So you have the equation sin(x) cosh(y) +i cos(x) sinh(y)=-2. Solve for x, y.

ehild
 
thanks. I thought that I needed to use that formula, but I was unaware that it was a definition! I tried doing this but I will try again!
 
nope. I'm still incredibly lost here. I don't even know what w is. That is the definition for sin(z). I am not looking for sin(z). I am looking for sin(w). If sin(w)=sin(x)cosh(y)+icos(x)sinh(y), then I just end up going in circles.

my textbook says in order to define arcsin(z), we write w=arcsin(z) when z=sin(w). That's pretty much useless to me. What is w?
 
yes. that was in the initial question.
 
what is the rectangular representaion of sin(w) though? no matter what I do I just keep ending up back at arcsin(-2), which is where I started.
 
richyw said:
what is the rectangular representaion of sin(w) though? no matter what I do I just keep ending up back at arcsin(-2), which is where I started.

w=x+iy ( x is the real component and y is the imaginary component of the complex number w) .

sin(w)=sin(x) cosh(y) +i cos(x) sinh(y)=-2.

What are x and y? Compare the real parts and the imaginary parts of both sides of the equation. Show your work.ehild
 
really? that is the definition of w? how does that make it any different from z then?

anyways I am getting stuck even trying to solve that.

I have

sin(x)cosh(y)+i cos(x)sinh(y)=-2

so

sin(x)cosh(y)=-2
cos(x)sinh(y)=0

the second equation says that either cos(x)=0 or sinh(y)=0, if sinh(y)=0 then y=0, but then in the first equation sin(x)=-2 which can't hapen. So then I have

Cos(x)=0
x = π (n - 1/2)

plugging into the first equation is then

[tex]\sin(\pi(n-1/2))\cosh(y)=-2[/tex]
[tex](-1)^n\cosh(y)=-2[/tex]
 
uh, so I guess[tex]y=\cosh^{-1}2[/tex][tex]x=\pi\left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right)[/tex]
 
[tex]y=\ln\left(2+\sqrt{3}\right)[/tex]
 
no. it's not I don't think because I would want cosh(y)=2, so I would need to have sin(x) = -1, so
x = π(2n-1/2) right?

if I do this I think I can hack together something that gives me the correct answer. However I am still uncomfortable with how we can just say w = x+iy . I don't get that at all. To me it seems like saying w = x + iy and then saying sin(w)=z is like saying sin(z)=z
 
oh wait, I see now why that is not a problem. This all makes sense to me now. Thank you for helping me.
 
You are welcome :smile:z is just an arbitrary complex number. An arbitrary complex number z can be written with it real part (x) and imaginary part (y) as z=x+iy. We have a special complex number now: w=arcsin(-2) which also has a real part and an imaginary part. We could have denoted them something else , u, v instead of x and y to avoid confusionehild