Prove that s^2=(s')^2 using the Lorentz Transformation

castrodisastro
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

I am learning special relativity and we came across the invariant quantity s = x2 - (ct)2. Our professor wants us to prove it. I admit that this is a proof and belongs in the mathematics section but I didn't see an Algebra section and this is most easily identified by those learning special relativity.

The assignment simply states

"Prove s2 = s'2"


Homework Equations


s2= x2-(ct)2

[itex]\gamma[/itex]=[1-([itex]\frac{v}{c}[/itex])2]-1/2

x' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt)

t' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook is telling me in one sentence that if we apply the lorentz transformation to x and t then s2 = s'2...so I did that...

I choose to start with s'2 = x'2-(ct')2

Applying the lorentz transformation to x' and t' our equation becomes...

s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt))2-(c([itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2))2

Expanding what we have takes us to...

s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex]2(x2-2vt+(vt)2)-(c2[itex]\gamma[/itex]2(t2)-2(v/c2)x+(v2/c4)x2))

If I combine some terms...

s'2 = [itex]\gamma[/itex]2[x2(1-(v2/c4)+t2(v-1)+2v((x/c2)-t)]

From here I tried a couple of different things on scratch paper but I couldn't see particular direction that would simplify it all down. Am I just not being patient enough and not seeing that it gets worse before it gets better?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
castrodisastro said:

Homework Statement

I am learning special relativity and we came across the invariant quantity s = x2 - (ct)2. Our professor wants us to prove it. I admit that this is a proof and belongs in the mathematics section but I didn't see an Algebra section and this is most easily identified by those learning special relativity.

The assignment simply states

"Prove s2 = s'2"


Homework Equations


s2= x2-(ct)2

[itex]\gamma[/itex]=[1-([itex]\frac{v}{c}[/itex])2]-1/2

x' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt)

t' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook is telling me in one sentence that if we apply the lorentz transformation to x and t then s2 = s'2...so I did that...

I choose to start with s'2 = x'2-(ct')2

Applying the lorentz transformation to x' and t' our equation becomes...

s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt))2-(c([itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2))2

Expanding what we have takes us to...

s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex]2(x2-2vt+(vt)2)-(c2[itex]\gamma[/itex]2(t2)-2(v/c2)x+(v2/c4)x2))

If I combine some terms...

s'2 = [itex]\gamma[/itex]2[x2(1-(v2/c4)+t2(v-1)+2v((x/c2)-t)]

From here I tried a couple of different things on scratch paper but I couldn't see particular direction that would simplify it all down. Am I just not being patient enough and not seeing that it gets worse before it gets better?

Thanks in advance.
You made a bunch of algebra errors. The last equation you had that was correct was: s'2 = x'2-(ct')2

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
760
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K