MHB Find Area of Polygon: Simpler Method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blandongstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Polygon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the area of a polygon defined by the points (3,5), (5,11), (14,7), (8,3), and (6,6). A simpler method than dividing the polygon into triangles is suggested: the Shoelace formula, which provides a systematic way to calculate the area based on the coordinates of the vertices. The formula is detailed, showing how to compute both positive and negative terms from the coordinates. Using the Shoelace formula for the given points results in an area of 41.5. Alternative methods, such as using trapezoids, are also mentioned for calculating the area.
Blandongstein
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Find the area of the polygon formed by the points (3,5), (5,11), (14,7), (8,3), and (6,6).

I can find the area of the polygon by dividing it into 3 triangles and then finding area of each triangle separately. I want to know if there is any simpler way of doing this.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello DigitalComputer! Such problems are solved using the shoelace formula. If $A_r (x_r , y_r); \ r = 1,2,3, \cdots , n$ be the vertices of a polygon, taken in order then the area of the polygon $A_1 A_2 A_3 \cdots A_n$ is given by

\[\text{area}= \Bigg|\frac{1}{2}\left( \sum_{r=1}^{n-1} \begin{vmatrix}x_i & y_i \\ x_{i+1} & y_{i+1}\end{vmatrix}+\begin{vmatrix}x_n & y_n \\ x_{1} & y_{1}\end{vmatrix}\right) \Bigg|\]
 
Last edited:
DigitalComputer said:
Find the area of the polygon formed by the points (3,5), (5,11), (14,7), (8,3), and (6,6).

I can find the area of the polygon by dividing it into 3 triangles and then finding area of each triangle separately. I want to know if there is any simpler way of doing this.


Hi DigitalComputer, :)

To elaborate more on the Shoelace method, suppose you have a set of points, \((x_i,\,y_i)\mbox{ where }i=1,\,2,\,\cdots,\,n\), which are vertices of a polygon. Then the Shoelace formula is,

\[A={1 \over 2}|x_1y_2 + x_2y_3 + \cdots + x_{n-1}y_n + x_ny_1 - x_2y_1 - x_3y_2 - \cdots - x_ny_{n-1} - x_1y_n|\]

where \(A\) is the area of the polygon.

Note that in the Shoelace formula, the positive terms are obtained by the following manner;

The first \(x\) coordinate is multiplied by the second \(y\) coordinate, the second \(x\) coordinate is multiplied by the third \(y\) coordinate and so on. Finally the nth, \(x\) coordinate is multiplied by the first \(y\) coordinate.

And the negative terms are obtained by,

The second \(x\) coordinate is multiplied by the first \(y\) coordinate, the third \(x\) coordinate is multiplied by the second \(y\) coordinate and so on. Finally the first \(x\) coordinate is multiplied by the nth, \(y\) coordinate.

In your case, you have the points, \((3,5),\,(5,11),\, (14,7),\, (8,3)\mbox{ and }(6,6)\). Therefore by the Shoelace formula,

\[A=\frac{1}{2}|(3\times 11)+(5\times 7)+(14\times 3)+(8\times 6)+(6\times 5)-(5\times 5)-(14\times 11)-(8\times 7)-(6\times 3)-(3\times 6)|=41.5\]

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Hello, DigitalComputer!

Find the area of the polygon formed by the points;
. . A (3,5), B(5,11), C(14,7), D(8,3), and E(6,6).

I use trapezoids . . .

Code:
      |
      |           B
      |           o
      |          *: *
      |         * :   *
      |        *  :     *
      |       *   :   E   *
      |      *    :   o     *
      |     *     *   :*      *
      |    *  *   :   : *       o C
      | A o       :   :  *   *  :
      |   :       :   :   o     :
      |   :       :   :   D     :
      |   :       :   :   :     :
  - - + - + - - - + - + - + - - + - - -
      |   F       G   H   I     J
First, I find the total area under the tent-shaped figure:
. . trapezoids ABGF + BCJG.

Then I subtract the areas of the three lower trapezoids:
. ..AEHF + EDIH + DCJI
 
Thank You!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top