Find Equation of Line Passing Through $(1, -2, -3)$ & Perpendicular to Plane

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation of the line passing through the point $(1, -2, -3)$ and perpendicular to the plane defined by the equation $3x - y - 2z + 4 = 0$ is correctly formulated as $\overrightarrow{l}(t) = (1, -2, -3) + t \overrightarrow{v}$, where the perpendicular vector of the plane is $\overrightarrow{v} = (3, -1, -2)$. This formulation effectively demonstrates that the line is parallel to the normal vector of the plane, confirming its perpendicularity. The approach taken is efficient and accurate for deriving the line's equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Knowledge of the equation of a plane in three-dimensional space
  • Familiarity with parametric equations of lines
  • Basic concepts of perpendicularity in vector geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector operations in three-dimensional space
  • Learn how to derive equations of lines from points and direction vectors
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of planes and their normal vectors
  • Investigate applications of line and plane equations in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector geometry and need to understand the relationships between lines and planes in three-dimensional space.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hello! :o

Find the equation of the line that passes through $(1, -2, -3)$ and that is perpendicular to the plane $3x-y-2z+4=0$.

Can we formulate it as followed??

The perpendicular vector of the plane is $\overrightarrow{v}=(3, -1, -2)$.

Since the line that we are looking for is also perpendicular to the plane, we have that the line is parallel to the vector $\overrightarrow{v}$.

Therefore, the line is $$\overrightarrow{l}(t)=(1, -2, -3)+t \overrightarrow{v}$$

Is it correct?? (Wondering)

Could I improve something at the formulation ?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

It's OK, and I think is the "cheapest" way to find the equation, good work! :cool:
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi,

It's OK, and I think is the "cheapest" way to find the equation, good work! :cool:

Great! Thank you very much! (Smile)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K