MHB Find Equation of Plane Perpendicular to Line $l(t)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

If we want to find the equation of the plane that is perpendicular to the line $l(t)=(-1,-2,3)t+(0,7,1)$ and passes through $(2,4,-1)$.

If (x,y,z) is a point of the line then it is of the form (-t,-2t+7,3t+1).

We get that $t=-x=\frac{7-y}{2}=\frac{z-1}{3} \Rightarrow -2x=7-y=\frac{2z-2}{3} \Rightarrow -6x=21-3y=2z-2 $

Can we find in that way the equation of the plane?

Also, is the following way also right to find the desired equation?

For $t=1$ , $a=(-1,5,4)$ where $a \in l(t)$.

Let $(x,y,z)$ be a point of the plane.

Then $(x-2,y-4,z+1)$ belongs to the plane.

Since $l(t)$ is perpendicular to the plane, $a$ is also perpendicular to the plane and since $(x,y,z)$ is a point of the plane, $a$ is perpendicular to $(x,y,z)$. So $a \cdot (x,y,z)=0 \Rightarrow -x+5y+4z=14$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
For $t=1$ , $a=(-1,5,4)$ where $a \in l(t)$.

Let $(x,y,z)$ be a point of the plane.

Then $(x-2,y-4,z+1)$ belongs to the plane.
Why?

evinda said:
Since $l(t)$ is perpendicular to the plane, $a$ is also perpendicular to the plane
If you write $a \in l(t)$, it means that $a$ is a point, and a point cannot be perpendicular to anything.

evinda said:
since $(x,y,z)$ is a point of the plane, $a$ is perpendicular to $(x,y,z)$.
Again, points can't be perpendicular.

It is known that the equation of a plane is $Ax+By+Cz+D=0$ where $(A,B,C)$ are the coordinates of a vector perpendicular to the plane. In your case, this vector is $(−1,−2,3)$. It is left to substitute the coordinates of a point on the plane into the equation to find $D$.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Back
Top