Find frequency such that two components have same average power

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the frequency at which two resistors in a circuit have the same average power. The user explores various methods, including using power equations and Kirchhoff's rules, to establish that the effective impedance is equal for both resistors. They conclude that at resonance frequency, the currents through the resistors must be equal, leading to the relationship between frequency, capacitance, and resistance. The user realizes that making the reactances of the inductor and capacitor equal ensures identical voltage drops, thus equal power in the resistors. Ultimately, they appreciate the clarity gained after extensive analysis of the problem.
Tobias Holm
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
At what frequency is the average power in the two resistors the same? (Hint: Use a symmetry argument as calculations are tough). Use inductance ##L=2CR^2##.
Circuit: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17yHMDfH5zY7J42wewqI4P4nLTkpsXhQa/view?usp=sharing
Relevant Equations
Kirchhoff's loop law:
$$ \sum_j \tilde{V}_j = \sum_j \tilde{I}_j Z_{L, j} + \sum_j \tilde{I}_j Z_{C, j} + \sum_j \tilde{I}_j Z_{R, j} $$

Component impedance:
##Z_L = -i\omega L##, ##Z_C = i/(\omega C)## and ##Z_R = R##.

AC current:
$$ \tilde{I}(t) = |\tilde{I}_{max}| \cos (\omega t + \phi) $$

Average power:
$$P_{ave} = \frac{1}{2} |\tilde{I}_{max}|^2 R = \frac{V_0^2}{|Z|} \cos (\phi) $$
Where ##|\tilde{I}_{max}|## is the amplitude of the complex current and ##V_0## the amplitude of the AC voltage.
(This is my first time posting here, sorry in advance for any difficulties. )

All componenets of same type has same magnitude, so e.g. the two resistors both have $R$ resistance.
Given the difficulty of the previous exercises, I believe I'm over complicating the problem. However, here is what I've tried:

1) Use that the power in each resistor is half the total power.
I know the effective impedance is simply ##Z_{eff} = R## (calculated in earlier exercise). Thus the total average power is: $$P_{avg}^{tot} = \frac{1}{2} |\tilde{I}_{max}|^2 R$$ and each of the resistors must experience half of this power:
$$ P_{avg} = \frac{1}{2} |\tilde{I}_{max, R}|^2 R $$ $$ = \frac{1}{2}P_{avg}^{tot} = \frac{1}{4} |\tilde{I}_{max}|^2 R$$
I thought I might be able to find the angular frequency by using ##|\tilde{I}_{max, R}| =\frac{\tilde{I}(t)}{\cos (\omega t + \phi)}## but this seems rather complicated.

2) Set the two average power expressions equal to each other
This one I'm less certain about (I will leave out the tildes for brevity)
$$ P_{avg, 1} = P_{avg, 2} $$ $$ \frac{1}{2} I_{max, 1}^2 R_1 \cos(\alpha) = \frac{1}{2} I_{max, 2}^2 R_2 \cos (\beta)$$
I believe the trick is to say that ##\omega## is the resonance frequency, such that ##\alpha = \beta = 0##:
$$ I_{max, 1} = I_{max, 2} $$
But that does not give me an expression for ##\omega##, nor does it prove that the two currents actually are equal.

3) Use Kirchhoff's Loop- and Current Rule.
Since each resistor has same resistance, I should find an ##\omega## that makes the current flowing in the resistors equal to each other. If I write all the necessary equations for the loops and the condition:
$$ |\tilde{I}_{R1}| =|\tilde{I}_{R2}| $$
I get the result:
$$ \omega = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2} CR} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}$$
Which is the resonance frequency for a simple RLC-circuit. I believe this is the right answer, however it requires immense amount of algebra, and I have to do this exercise by hand, thus I'm inclined to believe this is not the correct method of obtaining the result.

Thanks in advance.

EDIT: Formatting
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you ignore the resistors for a moment, you'll see that you have a pair of voltage dividers consisting of series-connected L and C. What can you say about the reactances of L and C if both arrangements are to produce identical potential drops at their junctions?

1639323366636.png
 
  • Like
Likes Tobias Holm
If we ignore the resistors, we will see that for the two paths:
$$ V = I_1 (Z_1+Z_2) = I_2 (Z_2 +Z_1) $$
$$ I_1 =I_2 $$
So the current that runs through the pair is equal to each other.
However, I cannot see how we can just ignore the resistors? I get that we can conclude that their reactans is identical, but is that necessarily true for the original case, where the last one is in parallel with a resistor?
gneill said:
If you ignore the resistors for a moment, you'll see that you have a pair of voltage dividers consisting of series-connected L and C. What can you say about the reactances of L and C if both arrangements are to produce identical potential drops at their junctions?

View attachment 294034
 
If the two voltage dividers behave identically at the given frequency, then adding equal resistors in equivalent locations will have identical results for each path.
 
gneill said:
If the two voltage dividers behave identically at the given frequency, then adding equal resistors in equivalent locations will have identical results for each path.
I'm not sure exactly where you are getting at - Wouldn't adding the resistors at "equivalent locations" be on the same component, so e.g. we put the resistors on both capacitors not a capacitor and an inductor?
However, your comments made me realize the solution:
If I can make ##Z_L = Z_C## then the two voltage dividers is equal to each other, and thus the power in the resistors must be the same.

You have my thanks! The many hours I have spend on such a simple problem.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top