MHB Find Glass Thickness to Block 25% of Light in Sunglasses

fxacx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The intensity, I of light in lumens, passing through the glass of a pair of sunglasses is given by the
equation I(x) = I0 (0.8)^x , where x is the thickness of the glass in millimetres and I0 is the intensity of
light entering the glasses. How thick should the glass be so that it will block 25% of the light entering
the sunglasses?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
H
fxacx said:
The intensity, I of light in lumens, passing through the glass of a pair of sunglasses is given by the
equation I(x) = I0 (0.8)^x , where x is the thickness of the glass in millimetres and I0 is the intensity of
light entering the glasses. How thick should the glass be so that it will block 25% of the light entering
the sunglasses?

$0.75 I_0 = I_0 (0.8)^x$

solve for x ...
 
So the question is, again, do you know how to solve $a^x= y$? You titled this "Log/exponential word problem". Do you know what "logarithms" and "exponentials" are and how they are related?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top