How to Find the Expectation Value of H for an Infinite Square Well?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expectation value of the Hamiltonian operator \( H \) for a particle in an infinite square well, specifically using the initial wave function \( \Psi(x,0) = A(\psi_1 (x) + \psi_2 (x)) \). The energies are defined as \( E_1 = \frac{{\pi}^2 \hbar^2}{2m a^2} \) and \( E_2 = \frac{2{\pi}^2 \hbar^2}{m a^2} \). The expectation value \( \langle H \rangle \) is determined to be \( 0.5(E_1 + E_2) \) after normalizing the wave function and applying the orthonormality of the stationary states. This confirms that the average energy corresponds to the equal probabilities of measuring either energy state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically infinite square wells
  • Familiarity with wave functions and their normalization
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian operators and expectation values
  • Proficiency in using integrals in quantum mechanics calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of orthonormal functions in quantum systems
  • Explore the derivation of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of energy measurements in quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those working with wave functions and energy calculations in systems like infinite square wells.

bigevil
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This problem comes from David Griffiths' quantum mechanics book which I have been going through on my own.

A particle in the infinite square well has its initial wave function as an even mixture of the first two stationary states

\Psi(x,0) = A(\psi_1 (x) + \psi_2 (x)

I am to find the expectation value of H and state how it compares with E1 and E2.

(There were a few sub questions but I've done ok with them, except that finding the expectation value of x was incredibly tedious.)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a bit new to this. I'm assuming here that the particle can possesses either of these two energies given by

E = \frac{n^2 {\pi}^2 \hbar^2}{2m a^2}

which gives

E_1 = \frac{{\pi}^2 \hbar^2}{2m a^2}
E_2 = \frac{2{\pi}^2 \hbar^2}{m a^2}

I'm not sure what the probability that a given particle can assume either energy is. Can I take the question's word that there is an "even mixture" of the two states, so the probability for each state is 0.5?

If that is the case, then if I use

<H> = \int \Psi^{"*"} \hat{H} \Psi dx = E. How do I reconcile that with E1 and E2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track. I assume one of the subquestions are that you have to normalize the wave function.

When you have normalized it, you can find the probability of the wave function collapsing to psi_1 and psi_2, i.e. the probability of measuren E_1 and E_2. When you have these probabilities, you can find the expectation value.

You could also find it using the integral you wrote, but in order to do that, you would still have to normalize.

The results should of course give the same.
 
You can just use the expression you gave to calculate <H>.
Note that the wave functions are orthogonal and that <H> = Ei when H \Psi = E_i \Psi (i.e. \Psi is an eigenfunction).

By the way, what did you answer to the other part of the question ("what values might you get and with what probabilities")?
 
Thanks guys... but I'm still stuck. Based on the wave function (they share the same constant A) I gather that I have an equal chance of my measurement having E1 or E2. I'm going to literally guess the answer would be the average of the two, ie, 0.5(E1+E2).

Since expectation value of x corresponds to the average of several measurements of x, and E = H, so expectation of H must be the average of several measurement of E. Is that right?

CompuChip, I gave E1 and E2 as above and assume that they have an equal chance of occurring (ie 0.5).
 
For the first one, you don't have to guess. You have calculated A in question a), haven't you? Now (re-)read the text below example 2.2 (in my edition it's at the bottom of page 36): "Loosely speaking, ..." up to equation 2.38
Actually, you might want to read up to example 2.3.

You can also do the calculation explicitly, as I suggested. Let me get you started on the calculation:
<br /> \begin{align*} \langle H \rangle<br /> &amp; {} = \int \Psi^* \hat H \Psi \, dx \\<br /> &amp; {} = \int (A^* \psi_1^* + A^* \psi_2^*) \hat H (A \psi_1 + A \psi_2) \, dx \\<br /> &amp; {} = |A|^2 \int (\psi_1^* + \psi_2^*) \hat H (\psi_1 + \psi_2) \, dx \\<br /> &amp; {} = |A|^2 \left[ \int \psi_1^* \hat H \psi_1 \, dx + \int \psi_1^* \hat H \psi_2 \, dx + \int \psi_2^* \hat H \psi_1 \, dx + \int \psi_2^* \hat H \psi_2 \, dx \right]<br /> \end{align*} <br />
Now you can use that \hat H \psi_i = E_i \psi_i, where Ei is a number which you can pull outside the integral, and that the eigenfunctions are orthonormal (equation 2.31).
 
Compuchip, unfortunately, I have an old edition without the footnote, and a number of problems are different from other editions.

Ok... this wasn't so hard! I substituted the stationary state wavefunction into the formula for <H> as you suggested, and due to the orthonormality the two middle integrals are zero, and the two at the ends are E1 and E2, and the value for A when squared gives 0.5(E1 + E2). Checks out! Thanks...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
13K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K