Undergrad Find input values for smallest function amplitude

Click For Summary
To achieve the smallest function amplitude for y(x) with variables a, b, c, and d, the goal is to make the graph as horizontal as possible over the interval from a to a+90°. The user has approximate values for a, b, c, and d and seeks to refine them to a precision of 0.1. A suggested approach involves finding the highest and lowest points for various combinations of these variables and applying a minimization algorithm. However, there are concerns that the results may not significantly improve the flatness of the graph, particularly if c and d are constrained to values close to 60. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the challenges in achieving the desired precision and the potential limitations of the mathematical approach.
TheFistGuy
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I have a function y(x) with variables a; b; c; d.
equa.PNG

I know what the values of a; b; c; d roughly should be, but I am trying to calculate them precisely, so the graph of the function over the region from a to a+90° would look as straight (horizontal with smallest possible amplitude) as possible.

graph_s.png


How do I do this? Where do I start?
I haven't done any maths work in years but i still have access to Matlab, Mathematica, Mathcad from my collage days.

Any help greatly appriciated, as I can't find anything on the web, not knowing which keywords (proper terminology) I should be using.
 

Attachments

  • graph_s.png
    graph_s.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 476
  • equa.PNG
    equa.PNG
    3.7 KB · Views: 723
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
c=d=0 makes it exactly flat. Is that really what you want?
What is the actual problem you want to solve?

In general: You can find the highest and lowest point for different (a,b,c,d) and then run a conventional minimization algorithm to find the optimum.
 
Ahh, I am actually designing a mechanism with some levers and I stumbled upon this problem, which I decided to solve mathematically.

So I know approximate values:
c = 60.0 (plus or minus 1.0)
d = 60.0 (plus or minus 1.0)
a = 22.0° (plus or minus 1.0)
b = 292.0° (plus or minus 1.0)

I am really interested in calculating a,b,c,d with a precision of 0.1, so that the graph would look as flat as possible.
 
While you can do the procedure I suggested I'm highly confident that the result is not what you want. It will almost certainly run into the limits of +- 1, and I guess you'll get c=59, d=59, and I'm not sure if the values for a and b even matter. It won't make the graph notably flatter, and I don't see what you would learn from this mathematical solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K