Find Least Value of \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right|, |z| ≥ 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarshakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the least value of the expression \(\left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right|\) under the constraint that \(|z| \geq 3\). Participants are exploring the implications of this constraint and the behavior of the expression as \(|z|\) varies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to derive a minimum value using inequalities, specifically \(\left|z-\frac{-1}{z}\right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|\). There is a focus on substituting \(|z| = 3\) to find a minimum value, but discrepancies arise regarding the correctness of the resulting values. Others question the completeness of the reasoning and suggest that minimizing one expression does not guarantee minimizing another related expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and questioning the reasoning behind the calculations. There is acknowledgment of a potential correct answer, but also a recognition of incomplete reasoning in the approach taken. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, and participants are encouraged to reflect on their methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the inequality used in their reasoning and the conditions imposed by the problem statement. There is a noted tension between the derived minimum values and the constraints of the problem.

utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Least value of [itex]\left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right| if |z|\geq3 is[/itex]


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|[/itex]

So the minimum value will be

[itex]|z|- \frac{1}{|z|}[/itex]

Now for minimum value
|z| = 3 as it is the minimum value of |z|

Substituting the value of |z| I get
[itex]3- \frac{1}{3}[/itex]
=[itex]\frac{8}{3}[/itex]

But the correct answer is [itex]\frac{10}{3}[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
utkarshakash said:

Homework Statement


Least value of [itex]\left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right| if |z|\geq3 is[/itex]


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|[/itex]

So the minimum value will be

[itex]|z|- \frac{1}{|z|}[/itex]

Now for minimum value
|z| = 3 as it is the minimum value of |z|

Substituting the value of |z| I get
[itex]3- \frac{1}{3}[/itex]
=[itex]\frac{8}{3}[/itex]

But the correct answer is [itex]\frac{10}{3}[/itex]

Your reasoning is wrong (or at least, incomplete---see below), but you have arrived at the correct answer. The minimum value is, indeed, 8/3, and the posted answer of 10/3 is incorrect. Hint: to show that 10/3 is incorrect, look for a value z = iy along the imaginary axis that gives z + 1/z = (8/3)i, so for that z we have |z + 1/z| = 8/3, which is less that the alleged minimum of 10/3.

So, what did you do wrong? Well, your inequality
[tex]\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|[/tex]
is, indeed, true, but for some z it might be a strict inequality, so there is no guarantee that minimizing the right-hand-side will give an achievable minimum to the left-hand-side. I'll leave it up to you to see what else needs to be done to fix the argument.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
Your reasoning is wrong (or at least, incomplete---see below), but you have arrived at the correct answer. The minimum value is, indeed, 8/3, and the posted answer of 10/3 is incorrect. Hint: to show that 10/3 is incorrect, look for a value z = iy along the imaginary axis that gives z + 1/z = (8/3)i, so for that z we have |z + 1/z| = 8/3, which is less that the alleged minimum of 10/3.

So, what did you do wrong? Well, your inequality
[tex]\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|[/tex]
is, indeed, true, but for some z it might be a strict inequality, so there is no guarantee that minimizing the right-hand-side will give an achievable minimum to the left-hand-side. I'll leave it up to you to see what else needs to be done to fix the argument.

RGV

I can't make out any fault in my reasoning. Can you please bring it out?
 
utkarshakash said:
I can't make out any fault in my reasoning. Can you please bring it out?

I have already explained why your reasoning is incomplete: you have some expression A that you want to minimize, and you know that A ≥ B for some other expression B. Minimizing B does not necessarily minimize A.

For example, if f(x) = (x-1)2+ x4 and g(x) = (x-1)2, we certainly have f(x) ≥ g(x) for all x (and f = g for some x). However, the minimum of g(x) is = 0, and it occurs at x = 1, while the minimum of f(x) is = 0.2892734 and it occurs at x = 0.5897545 (as obtained using numerical methods). So, in this case, minimizing f by minimizing the simpler function g would fail. However, if I change f to f(x) = x2 + x4 and g(x) to g(x) = x2, we would get the correct answer by minimizing g instead of f.

So, sometimes your method works and sometimes it fails. The issue is whether you can apply it in your particular problem.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
I have already explained why your reasoning is incomplete: you have some expression A that you want to minimize, and you know that A ≥ B for some other expression B. Minimizing B does not necessarily minimize A.

For example, if f(x) = (x-1)2+ x4 and g(x) = (x-1)2, we certainly have f(x) ≥ g(x) for all x (and f = g for some x). However, the minimum of g(x) is = 0, and it occurs at x = 1, while the minimum of f(x) is = 0.2892734 and it occurs at x = 0.5897545 (as obtained using numerical methods). So, in this case, minimizing f by minimizing the simpler function g would fail. However, if I change f to f(x) = x2 + x4 and g(x) to g(x) = x2, we would get the correct answer by minimizing g instead of f.

So, sometimes your method works and sometimes it fails. The issue is whether you can apply it in your particular problem.

RGV

Hmmm... that seems quite correct. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K