Find Limit of Function: Does 0/0 Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ipos Manger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit of the function (3x² + ax + a + 3)/(x² + x - 2) as x approaches -2. Participants are exploring whether the limit exists, particularly in the context of encountering the indeterminate form 0/0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss factorizing the denominator and the implications of the numerator also equaling zero at x = -2. Questions arise regarding the existence of a common factor and the conditions under which the limit can be determined despite the indeterminate form.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the nature of indeterminate forms and the potential for limits to exist. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to factor both the numerator and denominator, and the possibility of using L'Hopital's Rule has been mentioned.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of polynomial limits and the conditions under which they can be simplified. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationship between the numerator and denominator when both approach zero.

Ipos Manger
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Does lim x-> -2 (3x2+ax+a+3)/(x2+x-2) exist?

If so, find the limit.

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried factorizing the denominator to (x+2)(x-1), but then I don't know how to proceed on the exercise. I have seen that the limit exists when the numerator equals 0, but why is this (the denominator is also 0)? Does 0/0 exist at all?
Code:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ipos Manger said:

Homework Statement



Does lim x-> -2 (3x2+ax+a+3)/(x2+x-2) exist?

If so, find the limit.

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried factorizing the denominator to (x+2)(x-1), but then I don't know how to proceed on the exercise. I have seen that the limit exists when the numerator equals 0, but why is this (the denominator is also 0)? Does 0/0 exist at all?

What value of a would make the numerator zero when x = -2?

When both numerator and denominator are zero (i.e., the indeterminate form 0/0), it's usually because there is a factor in common between the top and bottom. Although not certain, there's a good chance that a limit exists.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Mark44 said:
What value of a would make the numerator zero when x = -2?

When both numerator and denominator are zero (i.e., the indeterminate form 0/0), it's usually because there is a factor in common between the top and bottom. Although not certain, there's a good chance that a limit exists.
a = 15.

So that means I just have to learn that by heart? Isn't there sort of a formal proof to test that? On the other hand, how do you know there's a factor in common between the top and bottom knowing that numerator and denominator are zero?

Thank you for your answer.
 
I don't think you need to memorize what I said - just be aware that if a limit has the form "0/0" you're not done yet. "0/0" is not a value - it is an indeterminate form, which means that you can't determine a value. All of the limits below have this form, but they have wildly different limit values.

$$\lim_{x \to 0}\frac {x^2}{x} = 0$$
$$\lim_{x \to 0}\frac {x}{x} = 1$$
$$\lim_{x \to 0^+}\frac {x}{x^2} = \infty $$

Note that in the 3rd limit, the two-sided limit doesn't exist, and that's the reason I am using the one-sided limit, the limit as x approaches zero from the right.

As far as a theorem goes, the only one that comes to mind is L'Hopital's Rule, which is applicable in cases with the indeterminate forms 0/0 and ±∞/∞.
 
After you have factored the denominator, factor the numerator (or use Mark44's shortcut).
 
Ipos Manger said:
On the other hand, how do you know there's a factor in common between the top and bottom knowing that numerator and denominator are zero?
There's a theorem that says that if p(x) is a non-constant polynomial and p(a)=0, then p(x) can be factored into p(x)=(x-a)q(x), where q(x) is another polynomial. In this problem both the numerator and denominator are polynomials; therefore, if they both equal 0 at x=-2, they have (x-(-2)) as a common factor.
 
I'm sorry to hijack the thread, but does this mean that i have to learn as a general rule if the denominator is 0 (in the case of the limit), I have to solve the numerator for 0 and find the values that I can factorize? Thank you.
 
chatnay said:
I'm sorry to hijack the thread, but does this mean that i have to learn as a general rule if the denominator is 0 (in the case of the limit), I have to solve the numerator for 0 and find the values that I can factorize? Thank you.

I would say no, you don't have to do that. You must try to factorize the numerator IF it goes to 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K