Finding the limit of a multivariable function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the limit of a multivariable function as the variables approach the origin. The participants are exploring the behavior of the function near this point and questioning the existence of the limit based on different approaches to the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various paths to the origin, such as approaching along specific axes, and question whether these paths yield consistent limits. There is mention of substituting variables and converting to spherical coordinates to analyze the limit's dependence on angles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering suggestions on how to approach the problem and questioning the implications of their findings. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of spherical coordinates and substitutions to clarify the limit's behavior.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on proving that the limit is consistent across different approaches to the origin, and participants are encouraged to test various candidates to explore potential discrepancies.

schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Find the limit of the function below as ##\textbf{x}\to\textbf{0}##.
Relevant Equations
##\frac{e^{|\textbf{x}|^2}-1}{|\textbf{x}|^2+x^2_1x_2+x^2_2x_3}## where ##\textbf{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)## and ##|\textbf{x}|=\sqrt{x^2_1+x^2_2+x^2_3}##.
If one approaches the origin from where ##x_2=0##, the terms ##x^2_1x_2+x^2_2x_3## in the denominator equal ##0##. Substituting ##|\textbf{x}|^2## for ##t## yields the expression ##\frac{e^t-1}{t}##, which has limit 1 as ##\textbf{x}\to\textbf{0}## and thus ##t\to0##. So the limit should be 1 if it exists. How could one show that it does exist?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
schniefen said:
How could one show that it does exist?
You need to prove that, no matter how you approach the origin, the limit will always be the same...
Try a few candidates that might yield something different, to get a feeling.
 
BvU said:
You need to prove that, no matter how you approach the origin, the limit will always be the same...
Try a few candidates that might yield something different, to get a feeling.

Yes, but approaching along ##x_1=0## or ##x_3=0## doesn't simplify the expression, does it?
 
Oh, doesn't it :rolleyes: ?
What comes out ?
 
It only cancels one of the terms in the sum ##x^2_1x_2+x^2_2x_3## for ##x_1=0## and ##x_3=0## respectively.
 
And what is left over ?

Tip: substitute ## | x| = \sqrt {...} ## to get a clearer picture, especially in the denominator 😉 .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schniefen
Bedtime here (UTC+2) :sleep:
 
With a multi-variable limit, \left(x_1, x_2, x_3\right) going to (0, 0, 0), it might be best to convert to spherical coordinates. That way the limit is just as \rho goes to 0. If that limit depends on \theta or \phi there is no limit. If it is a single number, then that is the limit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schniefen and Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K