MHB Find Limit of Series w/o Quotations: 65 Characters

  • Thread starter Thread starter IHateFactorial
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Value
IHateFactorial
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Let $${a}_{n+1} = \frac{4}{7}{a}_{n} + \frac{3}{7}{a}_{n-1}$$ where a0 = 1, and a1 = 2.

Find $$\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}}{a}_{n}$$

Well, seeing as it says that x approaches infinity, the difference between where points an-1, an, and an+1 are plotted on the y-axis is almost insignificant, so we can simply apply a common value of x to all ais in the function. It would become:

$$x = \frac{4}{7}x + \frac{3}{7}x = \frac{7}{7}x = x$$

Seeing as x equals itself, the higher the value of n, we can say that:

$$\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}}{a}_{n} = \infty$$

Is this right? Or did I screw it up?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What I would do here is look at the characteristic equation for the linear homogeneous recursion:

$$7r^2-4r-3=0$$

$$(7r+3)(r-1)=0$$

And so we know the closed form is:

$$a_n=c_1\left(-\frac{3}{7}\right)^n+c_2$$

And we can use the initial values to determine the parameters:

$$a_0=c_1+c_2=1$$

$$a_1=-\frac{3}{7}c_1+c_2=2$$

Solving this system, we find:

$$c_a=-\frac{7}{10},\,c_2=\frac{17}{10}$$

Hence:

$$a_n=\frac{17-7\left(-\dfrac{3}{7}\right)^n}{10}$$

And so we find:

$$\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n=\frac{17}{10}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top