Find Lorentzian Scalar Product on 4-D Lie Algebra G

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a Lorentzian scalar product with a 1-3 signature on a four-dimensional Lie algebra G, generated by T1 to T4. The original poster seeks a left-invariant scalar product, similar to the classical trace method (tr(AB^t)), but struggles to identify a Lorentzian equivalent. There is confusion regarding the definition of the generators and the concept of a left-invariant scalar product in this context. Additionally, the non-semisimple nature of the four-dimensional Lie algebra complicates the search for an appropriate bilinear form. Clarification on these points is necessary for further assistance.
kroni
Messages
79
Reaction score
10
Hi everybody,

Let G a four dimmensionnal Lie group with g as lie algebra. Let T1 ... T4 the four generator. I would like to find à lorentzian scalar product (1-3 Signature) on it and left invariant. A classical algebra take tr (AB^t) as scalar product but I don't find à lorentzian équivalent. Did it contraint the generator or the structure constant to respect some criterion ?

Thanks for your answer

Clement
 
kroni said:
Hi everybody,

Let G a four dimmensionnal Lie group with g as lie algebra. Let T1 ... T4 the four generator. I would like to find à lorentzian scalar product (1-3 Signature) on it and left invariant. A classical algebra take tr (AB^t) as scalar product but I don't find à lorentzian équivalent. Did it contraint the generator or the structure constant to respect some criterion ?

Thanks for your answer

Clement
I've read your post now several times. I'd like to help you but I don't understand it. The ##T_i## are generators of ##g## or of ##G##? What do you mean by a left invariant scalar product? And Lorentzian in this context means exactly what? Since a four dimensional Lie Algebra isn't semisimple I have difficulties to understand which bilinear form you're looking for.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
885
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K