Find Magnitude of Gradient in Vector Y(x2,x3,x4)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aplrt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the magnitude of the gradient of a mapping \(Y(x_2,x_3,x_4)=(\sqrt{1-x_2^2-x_3^2-x_4^2},x_2,x_3,x_4)\). Participants explore the calculation of the gradient in the context of mapping from a disk to a 3-sphere, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of gradient magnitude in this setting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how to calculate the gradient and its magnitude for the mapping \(Y\).
  • One participant mentions a known result for a simpler case \(Y(s)=(\sqrt{1-s^2},s)\) and attempts to relate it to the current mapping.
  • Another participant provides the formula for the gradient of a scalar field and suggests calculating the partial derivatives for \(Y\).
  • There is uncertainty about the correct form of the gradient, with participants proposing different expressions and questioning their validity.
  • One participant clarifies that the mapping is from a disk to a 3-sphere and expresses a need for the gradient's magnitude to understand the mapping's properties.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the resulting equations and the desire for a simpler expression resembling \(1/\sqrt{1-...}\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach consensus on the correct form of the gradient or its magnitude, with multiple competing views and expressions presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to calculate the gradient in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of dealing with mappings rather than functions, which adds complexity to the calculation of partial derivatives and the gradient.

aplrt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused here. If I have Y(x2,x3,x4)=(sqrt(1-x2^2-x3^2-x4^2),x2,x3,x4), how do I find the magnitude of the gradient? I know that for Y(s)=(sqrt(1-s^2),s) the gradient is (-s/sqrt(1-s^2),s) and the magnitude of the gradient is 1/sqrt(1-s^2), and I'm supposed to get an expression similar to this. If I put r=(x2,x3,x4) then it would be Y(r)=(sqrt(1-r.r),r), but I'm not sure how to proceed here. Thankful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aplrt said:
I'm a bit confused here. If I have Y(x2,x3,x4)=(sqrt(1-x2^2-x3^2-x4^2),x2,x3,x4), how do I find the magnitude of the gradient? I know that for Y(s)=(sqrt(1-s^2),s) the gradient is (-s/sqrt(1-s^2),s) and the magnitude of the gradient is 1/sqrt(1-s^2), and I'm supposed to get an expression similar to this. If I put r=(x2,x3,x4) then it would be Y(r)=(sqrt(1-r.r),r), but I'm not sure how to proceed here. Thankful for any help.

Hi aplrt, :)

The gradient of a scalar field \(f(x_1,\,x_2,\,\cdots,\,x_n)\) on a rectangular coordinate system is given by,

\[\nabla f = \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_1 },\,\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_2},\,\cdots ,\,\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_n }\right)\]

So in your case,

\[\nabla Y = \left(\frac{\partial Y}{\partial x_2 },\,\frac{\partial Y}{\partial x_3 },\,\frac{\partial Y}{\partial x_4}\right)\]

Hope you can calculate the partial derivatives and continue the problem. :)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Thank you for your reply! I'm still confused though, how will it look like, will it be
\[\nabla Y = (\frac{-x_{2}}{\sqrt{1-...}}+1,\frac{-x_{3}}{\sqrt{1-...}}+1,\frac{-x_{4}}{\sqrt{1-...}}+1)\] or will it look like \[\nabla Y = ((\frac{-x_{2}}{\sqrt{1-...}},1,0,0),(\frac{-x_{3}}{\sqrt{1-...}},0,1,0),(\frac{-x_{4}}{\sqrt{1-...}},0,0,1))\] The second expression doesn't even make sense to me and the first one doesn't look right (and doesn't give the right magnitude). What confuses me is that it's the partial derivatives of a mapping and not a function, I'm not sure how to deal with mappings :/
 
aplrt said:
Thank you for your reply! I'm still confused though, how will it look like, will it be
\[\nabla Y = (\frac{-x_{2}}{\sqrt{1-...}}+1,\frac{-x_{3}}{\sqrt{1-...}}+1,\frac{-x_{4}}{\sqrt{1-...}}+1)\] or will it look like \[\nabla Y = ((\frac{-x_{2}}{\sqrt{1-...}},1,0,0),(\frac{-x_{3}}{\sqrt{1-...}},0,1,0),(\frac{-x_{4}}{\sqrt{1-...}},0,0,1))\] The second expression doesn't even make sense to me and the first one doesn't look right (and doesn't give the right magnitude). What confuses me is that it's the partial derivatives of a mapping and not a function, I'm not sure how to deal with mappings :/

Your first expression is correct. I suppose your second way of writing indicates the same thing. Can you please tell me what is the context of this problem? And where did you find the notation that you have used in your second expression?
 
Basically, it is a mapping from a disk to a 3-sphere (hypersphere) - a point (x2,x3,x4) in R3 is mapped to the 3-sphere by (sqrt(1-x2^2-x3^3-x4^),x2,x3,x4)=(x1,x2,x3,x4). I need the magnitude of the gradient to see how evenly or how far apart the points are mapped, but using the first expression I get a very clumsy equation that doesn't look right (the result should be something similar to 1/sqrt(1-...)). It would be fine to take the magnitude of the partial derivative with respect to x1, since this is the direction I'm interested in, if that's easier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K