Find Min Force on Particle 3 with q1,q2,q3 Charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the optimal position for a charged particle (Particle 3) placed between two other charged particles (Particles 1 and 2) to minimize the net electrostatic force acting on it. The charges and their arrangement on the x-axis are specified, with the goal of finding the coordinate that results in the minimum force.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the net force equation and the subsequent steps to find its minimum. Questions arise regarding the accuracy of algebraic manipulations and the signs during factoring. Some participants suggest using graphical or numerical methods to explore the behavior of the force function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on algebraic simplifications and suggesting alternative approaches to visualize the problem. There is recognition of common mistakes and encouragement to verify calculations. No consensus has been reached on the exact method to find the minimum force.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the polynomial derived from the force equation and the potential for errors in algebraic manipulation. The discussion reflects on the challenges of working with electrostatic forces and the implications of charge magnitudes and positions.

derek181
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Particles 1 and 2 are fixed in place on an x-axis at a separation of L=8cm. Their charges are q1=e q2=-27e. Particle 3 with charge q3=4e is to be placed on the line between particles 1 and 2, so that they produce a net electrostatic force F3net on it. a) at what coordinate should particle 3 be placed to minimize the magnitude of that force.


Homework Equations



F=(1/4piε)qq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Both forces are acting rightward.
So Fnet=(1/4piε)(q1*q3)/x^2+(1/4piε)(q2*q3)/(8-x)^2

This simplifies down to Fnet=e^2/piε(1/x^2+27/(8-x)^2)

Now take the derivative to minimize function

d(Fnet)/dx=(54e^2x^3-2e^2(8-x)^3)/piε(8-x)^3x^3

Set it to zero and my polynomial in the numerator is 8e^2(7x^3-6x^2+48x+128) and there is no min value in between 0 and 8!

Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show how you go from 54x^3-2(8-x)^3 to 8(7x^3-6x^2+48x+128) ? they are not the same.

(sorry for the notation, you too should use "Go Advanced" or read the guidelines point 6 for something more legible)...
 
54e2x3-2e2(8-x)3
first step
(8-x)3=512-192x+24x2-x3
Multiply that by -2e2 to get -1024e2+384e2x-48e2x2+2e2x3

Then ad the 54e2x3 to get 56e2x3-482x2+384e2x-1024e2

Then factor out 8e2 so 8e2(7x3-6x2+48x+128)

set that to zero and consequently get rid of the 8e2 leaving you with the polynomial 7x3-6x2+48x+128 in the numerator
 
Check the signs factoring out 8e^2 : why do only 3 out of four signs remain the same ?

Tip: factor out 4e^2/piε (a.k.a. ##4e^2\over 4\pi\epsilon_0^2##) right at the beginning. You are doing real work and you'll have less work and less chance of errors. The ##e^2## really blurs the picture, especially in the notation you use (but I suppose that's on PF only :smile:)

Then: If you are really stuck (and I'm with you there: it took me a long time to sort things out just as well), you can always do several more things:
  1. Make a graph - qualitatively at first. F runs away at x=0 and at x=8, and it definitely isn't infinite all over, so |F| MUST have a minimum.
  2. Do some numerical tests, x=1 F≈1.55, x=7 F≈27 so you'll have to end up somewhere near the smaller charge (of course).
 
Ahhhhh, geez. Thanks. It's always the simplest mistakes that get past me. Should have been -128 and I get a root of 2.
 
Happens to everybody. Hope the tips come in useful someday...
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K