Find most likely values of L, S, J for barium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kara386
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the most likely quantum numbers L, S, and J for barium based on its energy levels of 1.521 eV, 1.567 eV, and 1.676 eV. The user initially attempted to apply the Lande interval rule but encountered difficulties in calculating the correct value of j, leading to confusion regarding the phrase 'most likely' values. Ultimately, the user concluded that the energy levels correspond to a triplet state, with S = 1 and J derived from the relationship J = L + S, thus providing a clearer path to the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and atomic structure
  • Familiarity with the Lande interval rule
  • Knowledge of energy level transitions in atoms
  • Basic concepts of quantum numbers (L, S, J)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lande interval rule in detail for better application
  • Research quantum number assignments for various elements
  • Explore the concept of triplet states in atomic physics
  • Learn about energy level transitions and their implications in spectroscopy
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on atomic structure and quantum mechanics, as well as researchers analyzing spectral lines of elements like barium.

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The spectrum of barium contains the following series of energy levels (given relative to ground):
1.521, 1.567, 1.676 (all in eV)
What are the most likely values of L, S, J?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using the Lande interval rule, giving the lowest state the value j, then the 1.567 level j+1 and j+2 for 1.676. If the change between 1.521 and 1.567 is ##\Delta E = 0.046## and the change between 1.567 and 1.676 is ##\Delta E_2 = 0.109##, then ##\Delta E_2 \approx \frac{12}{5} \Delta E##. So by the interval rule
##\Delta E = 2B(j+1)## (1)
##\frac{12}{5}\Delta E = 2B(j+2)## (2)
Dividing (1) by (2) to get rid of the constant,
##\frac{5}{12} = \frac{j+1}{j+2}## which would give me ##j = -\frac{2}{7}##. Which is wrong. But that's the only method I can think of! Have I made a mistake or should I be using a different approach?

I'm also very confused by the phrase 'most likely' values; should the method I'm meant to use give multiple possibilities? Thanks for any help!
 
Do you know other relevant rules beside Lande? Even then, it is a rule, not an exact law. What values for j are possible in Barium (e.g. integer, half integer ...)? What is the nearest possible value to the one you calculated?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kara386
DrDu said:
Do you know other relevant rules beside Lande? Even then, it is a rule, not an exact law. What values for j are possible in Barium (e.g. integer, half integer ...)? What is the nearest possible value to the one you calculated?
Hi, thanks for your reply! Fairly sure I've solved it, assumed the levels were part of a triplet as the question says a series of energy levels, which would mean the j values are j, j+1, j+2 with j associated with the lowest energy levels. Then S = 1 for a triplet and J = L + S gives you the L value.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K