Find n and K value? (sheet metal question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter emlekarc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the K and n values for a tensile test-piece of half-hard aluminium alloy under specific elongation conditions. The user initially calculated engineering stress and strain incorrectly, particularly for the first point, leading to an erroneous n-value calculation. The correct engineering stress for the first point should be 0.11357 kN/mm², not 0.011357 kN/mm², which significantly impacts the derived values. The correct n-value, as per the reference book, is 0.12.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile testing principles
  • Knowledge of engineering stress and strain calculations
  • Familiarity with true stress and true strain concepts
  • Basic logarithmic functions for material science
NEXT STEPS
  • Review tensile testing methodologies for aluminium alloys
  • Study the calculation of true stress and true strain in material testing
  • Learn about the significance of K and n values in material properties
  • Explore common errors in engineering stress calculations
USEFUL FOR

Materials engineers, mechanical engineers, and students studying material science who are involved in tensile testing and analysis of aluminium alloys.

emlekarc
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no HH Template is shown.
Hello! Can someone please tell me where I'm messing up in this problem?

At 4% and 8% elongation, the loads on a tensile test-piece of half-hard aluminium alloy are 1.59 kN and 1.66 kN respectively. The test-piece has an initial width of 10 mm, thickness of 1.4 mm and gauge length of 50 mm. Determine the K and n values.

So, first I calculated the engineering stress at the second point:
1.66/(10*1.4) = .11857

Then the engineering strain at that point: (54-50)/50 = .08

The true stress is then: .11857(1+.08) = .128056

The true strain is then: ln(1+.08) = .07696

For for the first point, I did the same thing:
Engineering Stress: 1.59/(10*1.4) = .011357
Engineering Strain: (52-50)/50 = 0.4
True stress: .11357(1+.04) = .0118
True strain: ln(1+.04)=.03922

Then, I tried to calculate the n-value by:
ln(.128056)-ln(.0118) / ln(.07696)-ln(.03922) = 3.5371
ln(true stress)/ln(true strain)

The book says the answer is supposed to be 0.12, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong?

Thank you VERY much for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your engineering stress for the first point is off by a factor of 10.
 
Chestermiller said:
Your engineering stress for the first point is off by a factor of 10.
Thank you! I didn't even realize I did that! I really appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
88K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K