I Find P(X+Y>1/2) for given joint density function

Peter_Newman
Messages
155
Reaction score
11
Hey everybody, :smile:

I have a joint density of the random variables ##X## and ##Y## given and want to find out ##P(X+Y>1/2)##.

The joint density is as follows:

$$f_{XY}(x,y) = \begin{cases}\frac{1}{y}, &0<x<y,0<y<1 \\ 0, &else \end{cases}$$

To get a view of this I created a plot:

Areas2.PNG


As usual I would split the area up into two sub areas (see red dots) and doube integrate this. In this case for instance my calculation is the following:

$$P(X+Y>1/2) = P(Y>1/2 - X) = \int_{y=0.5}^{1} \int_{x=0}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \int_{x=0.5-y}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy \approx 0.5 + 0.1534 \approx 0.6534$$

The solution should be ##P(X+Y>1/2) = \frac{\ln(2)}{2}##, which I can not explain, that why I'am asking here. I think in my integral there could be a mistake, but I don't see the error...

I would be very happy for answers to this! Thank you! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks correct, as far as you've gone.
I suggest you write out the remainder of the steps you took to reach your numeric answer, doing first the inner and then the outer integrals and finally inserting the outer integration limits to obtain a closed formula for the result.
Advisors will then be able to spot any errors in your working.
 
Hello, thank you for the answer.

I will gladly comply with the request and show here my exact calculation path for the double integral:

$$\int_{y=0.5}^{1} \int_{x=0}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \int_{x=0.5-y}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy$$

$$= \int_{0.5}^{1} \left(\int_{0}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx\right) \, dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \left(\int_{x=0.5-y}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx \right) \, dy $$

$$= \int_{0.5}^{1} \left( 1\right) \, dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \left(2-\frac{0.5}{y} \right) \, dy $$
$$= 0.5 + 0.153426$$

But this equals not the "original solution" ##P(X+Y>1/2) = \frac{\ln(2)}{2}##...
 
Last edited:
I get 1 - log(2)/2, which is approx 0.653. So my calc agrees with yours. Maybe the book has the wrong answer. It happens.
 
Last edited:
Hello,

thank you for your reply and confirmation of the calculation. And my integral limits are not set wrong?

I think that assuming there is an error in the book, it comes from the fact that the authors have calculated ##P(X+Y<1/2)##, which would be the small triangle that arises when you draw the diagonal to 0. This would be, so to speak, the "white triangle" from the diagonal to the colored area (0 to 0.5 on y-axis and 0.25 x-axis (but integral limits are different here...)...
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top