Find P(X+Y>1/2) for given joint density function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probability P(X+Y>1/2) for the joint density function f_{XY}(x,y) = 1/y for 01/2) = ln(2)/2. The user suspects an error in the book's answer, suggesting it may actually pertain to P(X+Y<1/2). The calculations were confirmed by other participants, indicating the user's approach was correct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of joint probability density functions
  • Knowledge of double integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with the properties of logarithmic functions
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of probability distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of joint density functions and their applications
  • Study the method of double integration for calculating probabilities
  • Learn about the relationship between cumulative distribution functions and joint densities
  • Investigate common errors in probability calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, students studying probability theory, and anyone involved in statistical analysis or data science who needs to understand joint distributions and probability calculations.

Peter_Newman
Messages
155
Reaction score
11
Hey everybody, :smile:

I have a joint density of the random variables ##X## and ##Y## given and want to find out ##P(X+Y>1/2)##.

The joint density is as follows:

$$f_{XY}(x,y) = \begin{cases}\frac{1}{y}, &0<x<y,0<y<1 \\ 0, &else \end{cases}$$

To get a view of this I created a plot:

Areas2.PNG


As usual I would split the area up into two sub areas (see red dots) and doube integrate this. In this case for instance my calculation is the following:

$$P(X+Y>1/2) = P(Y>1/2 - X) = \int_{y=0.5}^{1} \int_{x=0}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \int_{x=0.5-y}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy \approx 0.5 + 0.1534 \approx 0.6534$$

The solution should be ##P(X+Y>1/2) = \frac{\ln(2)}{2}##, which I can not explain, that why I'am asking here. I think in my integral there could be a mistake, but I don't see the error...

I would be very happy for answers to this! Thank you! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks correct, as far as you've gone.
I suggest you write out the remainder of the steps you took to reach your numeric answer, doing first the inner and then the outer integrals and finally inserting the outer integration limits to obtain a closed formula for the result.
Advisors will then be able to spot any errors in your working.
 
Hello, thank you for the answer.

I will gladly comply with the request and show here my exact calculation path for the double integral:

$$\int_{y=0.5}^{1} \int_{x=0}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \int_{x=0.5-y}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx dy$$

$$= \int_{0.5}^{1} \left(\int_{0}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx\right) \, dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \left(\int_{x=0.5-y}^{y} \frac{1}{y} \, dx \right) \, dy $$

$$= \int_{0.5}^{1} \left( 1\right) \, dy + \int_{0.25}^{0.5} \left(2-\frac{0.5}{y} \right) \, dy $$
$$= 0.5 + 0.153426$$

But this equals not the "original solution" ##P(X+Y>1/2) = \frac{\ln(2)}{2}##...
 
Last edited:
I get 1 - log(2)/2, which is approx 0.653. So my calc agrees with yours. Maybe the book has the wrong answer. It happens.
 
Last edited:
Hello,

thank you for your reply and confirmation of the calculation. And my integral limits are not set wrong?

I think that assuming there is an error in the book, it comes from the fact that the authors have calculated ##P(X+Y<1/2)##, which would be the small triangle that arises when you draw the diagonal to 0. This would be, so to speak, the "white triangle" from the diagonal to the colored area (0 to 0.5 on y-axis and 0.25 x-axis (but integral limits are different here...)...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K