Find P_300 Given P_299: Initial State Vector Homework

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the state vector P_300 given the state vector P_299 and a transition matrix. The context is rooted in linear algebra and matrix operations, specifically regarding state transitions over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the state vectors and the transition matrix, with some suggesting that the transition matrix can be directly applied to P_299 to find P_300. Others question the necessity of knowing P0 in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have provided guidance on how to approach the calculation of P_300 using the transition matrix, while others are clarifying the role of P0 in the process.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of computational limitations with calculating high powers of the transition matrix, which may affect the approach taken by the original poster.

alexcc17
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that the initial vector P0 is not given and instead we are given that at time t=299 the state vector is P_299=[.1 .1 .8].
Than find P_300, the state vector at time t=300


Homework Equations


I also know from the problem it is referencing that the transition matrix is:

[.3 .4 .3]
T= [.5 0 .5]
[.5 .5 0]


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would just set up the equation as such:

P_299=P0 * T^299

and just take the inverse of T^299 and multiply it by P_299 to get the P0, then use that to find P_300, but my graphing calculator won't even calculate the 299th power of the transition matrix, so there must be another way to do this.

Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see any need to worry about P0. T describes how the state changes from one timestamp to the next, right? And you know the state at time 299. And you want the state at time 300? Either I'm missing some subtlety or you are missing the obvious.
 
Would it just be p_299*T to get p_300?
 
Yes, that's what an exponent means isn't it? T300v= T(T299v)
 
Wasn't sure if that applied to matrices. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K