MHB Find Product: $(a^4+b^4+c^4)$ and $(a^6+b^6+c^6)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the values of $(a^4+b^4+c^4)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^4}+\dfrac{1}{b^4}+\dfrac{1}{c^4}\right)$ and $(a^6+b^6+c^6)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^6}+\dfrac{1}{b^6}+\dfrac{1}{c^6}\right)$ given specific conditions involving sums and reciprocals of powers of numbers $a$, $b$, and $c$. The initial conditions provided are $(a^2+b^2+c^2)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^2}+\dfrac{1}{b^2}+\dfrac{1}{c^2}\right)=26$ and $(a^3+b^3+c^3)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^3}+\dfrac{1}{b^3}+\dfrac{1}{c^3}\right)=78$. A participant named Opalg has contributed a solution that appears to be correct, but there is a note regarding the problem's origin from a high school competition in China, pending validation. The discussion emphasizes the need for confirmation of the problem's legitimacy before proceeding further. The thread highlights the collaborative effort to solve a mathematical challenge.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $a,\,b,\,c$ be numbers such that $(a^2+b^2+c^2)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^2}+\dfrac{1}{b^2}+\dfrac{1}{c^2}\right)=26$ and $(a^3+b^3+c^3)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^3}+\dfrac{1}{b^3}+\dfrac{1}{c^3}\right)=78$. Find the value of $(a^4+b^4+c^4)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^4}+\dfrac{1}{b^4}+\dfrac{1}{c^4}\right)$ and $(a^6+b^6+c^6)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^6}+\dfrac{1}{b^6}+\dfrac{1}{c^6}\right)$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let $S_n = \dfrac{a^n}{b^n} + \dfrac{b^n}{c^n} + \dfrac{c^n}{a^n}$, and let $T_n = \dfrac{b^n}{a^n} + \dfrac{c^n}{b^n} + \dfrac{a^n}{c^n}$. Then $$26 = (a^2+b^2+c^2)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^2}+\dfrac{1}{b^2}+\dfrac{1}{c^2}\right) = 3 + S_2 + T_2$$ and $$78 = (a^3+b^3+c^3)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^3}+\dfrac{1}{b^3}+\dfrac{1}{c^3}\right) = 3 + S_3 + T_3.$$ Therefore $S_2 + T_2 = 23$ and $S_3 + T_3 = 75$.

The equation with roots $\frac ab$, $\frac bc$ and $\frac ca$ is $x^3 - S_1x^2 + T_1x - 1 = 0$, and the equation with roots $\frac ba$, $\frac cb$ and $\frac ac$ is $x^3 - T_1x^2 + S_1x - 1 = 0$. Use Newton's_identities on these equations, to get $$S_2 = S_1^2 - 2T_1,\qquad T_2 = T_1^2 - 2S_1$$. Therefore $$S_2 + T_2 = S_1^2 + T_1^2 - 2(S_1 + T_1) = (S_1+T_1)^2 - 2S_1T_1 - 2(S_1 + T_1).$$ Now write $p=S_1+T_1$ and $q = S_1T_1$, getting $S_2 + T_2 = p^2 - 2p - 2q$, so that $$(*)\quad p^2 - 2p - 2q = 23.$$

In a similar way, using Newton's identities again, $$S_3 = S_1^3 - 3S_1T_1 + 3, \qquad T_3 = T_1^3 - 3S_1T_1 + 3,$$ and so $$S_3 + T_3 = S_1^3 + T_1^3 - 6S_1T_1 + 6 = (S_1 + T_1)^3 - 3S_1T_1(S_1+T_1) - 6S_1T_1 + 6 = p^3 - 3pq - 6q + 6.$$ Therefore $$(**)\quad p^3 - 3pq - 6q = 69.$$

From $(*)$ and $(**)$ it follows that $$p^3 - 3p^2 - 3pq + 6p = 0,$$ $$2p^3 - 6p^2 - 3p(p^2 - 2p - 23) + 12 p = 0,$$ $$-p^3 + 81p = 0.$$ So $p$ is either $0$ or $\pm9$, and the corresponding values for $q$ are $-11.5$, $20$ and $38$. Then $S_1$ and $T_1$, which are the solutions of the equation $x^2 - px + q = 0$, must be the solutions of one of the equations $$x^2 - 11.5 = 0, \qquad x^2 - 9x + 20 = 0, \qquad x^2 + 9x + 38 = 0.$$ The last of those equations has no real solutions. So $\{S_1,T_1\}$ must be either $\{\sqrt{11.5},-\sqrt{11.5}\}$ or $\{4,5\}$. Therefore $\frac ab$, $\frac bc$ and $\frac ca$ (or their reciprocals) are the solutions of one of the equations $
x^3 - \sqrt{11.5}x^2 - \sqrt{11.5}x - 1 = 0$ or $x^3 - 4x^2 + 5x - 1 = 0$. But neither of those cubic equations has three real roots. It follows that there are no real numbers $a,b,c$ satisfying the given equations $(a^2+b^2+c^2)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^2}+\dfrac{1}{b^2}+\dfrac{1}{c^2}\right) = 26$ and $(a^3+b^3+c^3)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^3}+\dfrac{1}{b^3}+\dfrac{1}{c^3}\right) = 78$.

So there is something wrong either with the problem or with my solution.

If complex numbers are allowed then Newton's identities could be used to find values for $(a^4+b^4+c^4)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^4}+\dfrac{1}{b^4}+\dfrac{1}{c^4}\right)$ and $(a^6+b^6+c^6)\left(\dfrac{1}{a^6}+\dfrac{1}{b^6}+\dfrac{1}{c^6}\right)$. But then there would be three possible values for $\{S_1,T_1\}$, and the problem would not have a unique solution.
 
Hi Opalg! Thanks for participating in this unsolved challenge. I just double checked your solution and it seems there is nothing wrong with it. But just to let you know, I believe this is a competition problem from a high school in China and I will wait for the poster to mention anything about the validity of the problem and post back here.
 
I remember, I put this into my CAS and it was just boring algebraic equation manipulation. Such boring that I didn't even post the solution to give someone else the happiness... Unfortunately I don't have much time now to reproduce my solution. Maybe someone could give this another shot?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top