MHB Find Regression Equation for y on x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doffy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regression
Doffy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How do I determine the regression equation when not much information is given? For example:
Given the following equations:
2x + y = 13
2x + 5y = 20,

which one is the regression equation of y on x?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Regression equations only make sense in the context of data that you're trying to explain using some model. Your question is quite impossible to answer unless there is some data present. Were you given, say, a graph of some data? Or a table of data?
 
Ackbach said:
Regression equations only make sense in the context of data that you're trying to explain using some model. Your question is quite impossible to answer unless there is some data present. Were you given, say, a graph of some data? Or a table of data?

Well, I am afraid that no further information of any kind is available.
However, I was wondering that since regression coefficient is the geometric mean of the regression coefficients, can we use this fact to determine our equation?
Also that, the range of r is -1$$\le$$ r $$\le$$ +1. Is it possible?
 
We have no regression coefficients, we have no context. Your question is completely impossible to answer as is, I'm afraid. Both linear equations you've given could easily be the best fit line for a particular data set; but without that data set, there's no way to tell which line would fit the data better.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top