MHB Find Remainder When Divided by 19

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deanmark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Remainder
Deanmark
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Compute the remainder of 2^(2^17) + 1 when divided by 19. The book says to first compute 2^17 mod 18 but I don’t understand why we go to mod 18. Advice would be appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Deanmark said:
Compute the remainder of 2^(2^17) + 1 when divided by 19. The book says to first compute 2^17 mod 18 but I don’t understand why we go to mod 18. Advice would be appreciated

Hi Deanmark,

That's because of the Little Theorem of Fermat:
$$a^{p-1} \bmod p = 1$$
where $p$ is prime and $a$ is any number except for a multiple of $p$.

So if we can write $2^{17}$ as some multiple of $18$ and a remainder, say $2^{17} = 18k + r$, then:
$$2^{(2^{17})} + 1 \bmod 19 = 2^{18k+r} + 1 \bmod 19 = (2^{18})^k\cdot 2^r + 1 \bmod 19 = 2^r + 1 \bmod 19$$
 
The parts of my wall that have yet to be punched thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top