Find Result <x> for Particle in n=3 Excited State of Rigid Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpaceTrekkie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expectation value for a particle in the second (n=3) excited state of a rigid box. The relevant equation is = (2/a)∫x sin²(nπx/a) dx, evaluated from 0 to a. The confusion arises from understanding how the quantum number "n" influences the sine-squared term in the integral. The correct approach involves using integral-solving software like Maple to simplify the computation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of expectation values in quantum systems
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Experience with computational tools such as Maple
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Learn to evaluate integrals involving trigonometric functions
  • Explore the use of Maple for solving complex integrals
  • Research the implications of quantum numbers on particle states
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working on particle behavior in confined systems, and anyone interested in computational methods for solving integrals in physics.

SpaceTrekkie
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the result <x> (the expectation value) found when the position of a particle in the second (n=3) excited state of a rigid box.


Homework Equations


<x> = (2/a)\intxsin2(xpi/a)dx

evaluated from 0 to a



The Attempt at a Solution



well when that integral is evaulated using the ground state the answer is a/2. I am not sure how they even got that. But my real problem is, is where does the n = 3 come in?

and where do I go from there?

thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"n" appears in the numerator of the argument of the sine-squared term. "n" denotes the state of the particle.

a/2 for the ground state (n = 1) is correct only if the boundaries of the box occur at 0 and a. To get the answer, all you need to do is integrate. In QM, the integrals may get a little complicated to do by hand, so a good integral-solver software application (e.g. Maple) will likely benefit you.
 
ooo ok. Thanks, I figured it out. The use of the boundary conditions are what was confusing me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K