Ground state and 1st excited state energy of 3 Fermions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the ground state and first excited state energies of three non-interacting fermions in a harmonic oscillator potential. The original poster has derived the wavefunction but is uncertain about the energy calculations, particularly in the context of the Pauli exclusion principle.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of the Pauli exclusion principle and its implications for energy states. There is uncertainty about the correct labeling of quantum numbers and the significance of particle spin.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the possible configurations of the fermions in the lowest energy states, while others emphasize the importance of specifying particle spin. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored regarding the energy states and the role of the exclusion principle.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the definition of the index n and the unspecified spin of the fermions, which may affect the uniqueness of the solution.

catpotato
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So in my problem, there's a given of 3 non interacting fermions in a harmonic well potential. I already got the wavefunction but i have problems in obtaining the ground state energy and its 1st excited state energy for 3 fermions (assuming they are non interacting and identical)

Homework Equations


En = E1 + E2 + E3
En = (n + 1/2) ħω

The Attempt at a Solution


Since they are fermions, i tried applying pauli's exclusion principle so my En would be equal to: (n1 + 1/2) ħω + (n2 + 1/2) ħω + (n3 + 1/2) ħω
where n1 = 1, n2 = 2, n3 = 3 for the ground state.

I am not sure if this is right for fermions so I'm kinda stuck and still skeptic on how to solve for the 1st excited state. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm no expert in this type of problem, but with opposite spins, shouldn't it be possible to have two particles in the lowest energy state?
 
Charles Link said:
I'm no expert in this type of problem, but with opposite spins, shouldn't it be possible to have two particles in the lowest energy state?
i think so too, if there were two particles in the lowest energy then n1 and n2 will both be equal to 1? and n3 will be equal to 2?
 
catpotato said:
i think so too, if there were two particles in the lowest energy then n1 and n2 will both be equal to 1? and n3 will be equal to 2?
I think the lowest state has ## n=0 ##. I think I have it right, but I am hardly an expert in this area. ## \\ ## Additional comment: For the wave function, I think it is necessary to use a Slater determinant type waveform, but I would like to hear from someone with considerable Q.M. expertise. ## \\ ##@bhobba Might you have an input here?
 
Last edited:
catpotato said:

Homework Equations


En = E1 + E2 + E3
En = (n + 1/2) ħω
You have to be careful with the notation. Does the index n label the particle or the state of the h.o.?

Charles Link said:
I think the lowest state has ## n=0 ##. I think I have it right, but I am hardly an expert in this area.
Yes, that is correct.

catpotato said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Since they are fermions, i tried applying pauli's exclusion principle so my En would be equal to: (n1 + 1/2) ħω + (n2 + 1/2) ħω + (n3 + 1/2) ħω
where n1 = 1, n2 = 2, n3 = 3 for the ground state.

I am not sure if this is right for fermions so I'm kinda stuck and still skeptic on how to solve for the 1st excited state. Any help would be much appreciated.
You have to find the combinations of n that give you the lowest energy and then the next lowest energy without violating the Pauli exclusion principle. There might be more than one possible solution for the first excited state.

By the way, you haven't specified the spin of the fermions. It is very important here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
DrClaude said:
You have to be careful with the notation. Does the index n label the particle or the state of the h.o.?Yes, that is correct.You have to find the combinations of n that give you the lowest energy and then the next lowest energy without violating the Pauli exclusion principle. There might be more than one possible solution for the first excited state.

By the way, you haven't specified the spin of the fermions. It is very important here.

oh i forgot, the En there is supposed to be the total energy of the particles and the spin wasn't specified in our homework.
 
catpotato said:
oh i forgot, the En there is supposed to be the total energy of the particles and the spin wasn't specified in our homework.
I'm still not sure what the index n represents. If spin was not specified, then the solution is not unique.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K