MHB Find the Angle of Parable Tangent from Human Running Step

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angle of the parable tangent related to human running steps, specifically the arc traced by a foot during a step. A formula provided by a researcher indicates that the stride angle tangent is calculated as 4 times the height divided by the step length. The participants express confusion about the reasoning behind multiplying the height by 4. A mathematical derivation is presented, confirming that the angle can be expressed as the arctangent of the ratio of 4 times the height to the step length. This analysis highlights the relationship between step height and length in determining the angle of the arc in human running motion.
Barkiernan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a masters student studying motion analysis in human running.

I need to find the angle of the parable tangent derived from the theoretical arc traced by a foot during a step and the ground (see attached). The arc comprises of a persons step height and step length and I need to find the angle of the arc it creates. No other research regarding this angle has manual calculated it.

I have contacted the researcher and he gave me the following formula:

Stride (step) angle tangent = 4*height / Step length
Therefore, the Stride (step) angle = tan-1(4*height/step length)”

However we are not sure why the height is multiplied by 4 ?

View attachment 9260

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • BBCFCE55-FE06-4875-BFC7-9B0B1D8EBB01.jpeg
    BBCFCE55-FE06-4875-BFC7-9B0B1D8EBB01.jpeg
    31.4 KB · Views: 132
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

If we let \(\ell\) be the stride length, and \(h\) be the max height, and orient our coordinate axes such that the "toe off" is at the origin, then we have:

$$f(x)=kx(x-\ell)$$

Now, we must have:

$$f\left(\frac{\ell}{2}\right)=h$$

$$k\left(\frac{\ell}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\ell}{2}-\ell\right)=h\implies k=-\frac{4h}{\ell^2}$$

And so:

$$f(x)=-\frac{4h}{\ell^2}x(x-\ell)=-\frac{4h}{\ell^2}x^2+\frac{4h}{\ell}x$$

From this we find:

$$f'(x)=-\frac{8h}{\ell^2}x+\frac{4h}{\ell}$$

And then:

$$f'(0)=\frac{4h}{\ell}$$

Thus, we may conclude:

$$\alpha=\arctan\left(\frac{4h}{\ell}\right)$$
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K