MHB Find the Angle of Parable Tangent from Human Running Step

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angle of the parable tangent related to human running steps, specifically the arc traced by a foot during a step. A formula provided by a researcher indicates that the stride angle tangent is calculated as 4 times the height divided by the step length. The participants express confusion about the reasoning behind multiplying the height by 4. A mathematical derivation is presented, confirming that the angle can be expressed as the arctangent of the ratio of 4 times the height to the step length. This analysis highlights the relationship between step height and length in determining the angle of the arc in human running motion.
Barkiernan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a masters student studying motion analysis in human running.

I need to find the angle of the parable tangent derived from the theoretical arc traced by a foot during a step and the ground (see attached). The arc comprises of a persons step height and step length and I need to find the angle of the arc it creates. No other research regarding this angle has manual calculated it.

I have contacted the researcher and he gave me the following formula:

Stride (step) angle tangent = 4*height / Step length
Therefore, the Stride (step) angle = tan-1(4*height/step length)”

However we are not sure why the height is multiplied by 4 ?

View attachment 9260

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • BBCFCE55-FE06-4875-BFC7-9B0B1D8EBB01.jpeg
    BBCFCE55-FE06-4875-BFC7-9B0B1D8EBB01.jpeg
    31.4 KB · Views: 130
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

If we let \(\ell\) be the stride length, and \(h\) be the max height, and orient our coordinate axes such that the "toe off" is at the origin, then we have:

$$f(x)=kx(x-\ell)$$

Now, we must have:

$$f\left(\frac{\ell}{2}\right)=h$$

$$k\left(\frac{\ell}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\ell}{2}-\ell\right)=h\implies k=-\frac{4h}{\ell^2}$$

And so:

$$f(x)=-\frac{4h}{\ell^2}x(x-\ell)=-\frac{4h}{\ell^2}x^2+\frac{4h}{\ell}x$$

From this we find:

$$f'(x)=-\frac{8h}{\ell^2}x+\frac{4h}{\ell}$$

And then:

$$f'(0)=\frac{4h}{\ell}$$

Thus, we may conclude:

$$\alpha=\arctan\left(\frac{4h}{\ell}\right)$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top