Find the Angular Acceleration with and Without the disk inertia

Click For Summary
To determine the angular acceleration of a uniform disk, two scenarios are analyzed: one ignoring the disk's rotational inertia and the other considering it. In the first case, the linear acceleration of the weights is calculated to derive the angular acceleration of the disk. In the second scenario, three free-body diagrams are utilized, requiring both force and moment equations to account for the disk's inertia. The moment equation involves the tensions from the weights acting on the disk, and the rotational inertia is expressed as IO = 2mr². Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Determine the angular acceleration of the uniform disk if (a) the rotational inertia of the disk is ignored and (b) the inertia of the disk is considered. The system is released from rest, the cord does not slip on the disk, and bearing friction at O may be neglected. The angular acceleration is positive if counterclockwise, negative if clockwise.

I have attached an image of the question


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



m1 = 1.5 kg
m2 = 3.1kg
r = 0.32m

I started by summing the moments about O

ƩMO = (-m1gr + m2gr)/IO

IO = 2mr2 but I'm not sure why this is the case. A classmate of mine said something about adding in the inertias from the weight but I'm not sure what this means.

Also, how to I account for the disk inertia?

Any advice would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • dyn 6.048.png
    dyn 6.048.png
    21 KB · Views: 973
Physics news on Phys.org
I started by summing the moments about O
... which confused you.

The force on the disk comes from the tensions acting at opposite points.
The tensions come from the weights. The equation is ƩM = Iα ... which is not the same as:
ƩMO = (-m1gr + m2gr)/IO

Breaking it down:

In the first case you would be better to find the linear acceleration of the weights, and use that to deduce the angular acceleration of the disk.

In the second case, you have three free-body diagrams instead of just two.
You need ƩF=ma as well as ƩM = Iα
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K