Find the deflection of the following points

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating deflection in a structural analysis problem involving two areas (A1 and A2) and three forces (F1, F2, and F3). The correct formula for deflection, δB, is derived using the equations σ = F/A, ε = σ/E, and δ = ε*L, leading to δB = 5.1785 * 10^-3 m. However, discrepancies arise when comparing calculated values for δD, indicating potential errors in force application in the equations. The resolution involves ensuring proper equilibrium through free body diagrams for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with stress and strain calculations
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically Young's modulus (E)
  • Ability to create and analyze free body diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of structural deflection calculations
  • Learn about free body diagram techniques for equilibrium analysis
  • Study the effects of varying material properties on deflection
  • Explore advanced topics in finite element analysis (FEA) for complex structures
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, particularly structural and mechanical engineers, students studying mechanics of materials, and professionals involved in stress analysis and design optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
in this question

Capture.JPG



A1=8*10-4m2
A2=5*10-4m2
E=70*109Pa
F1=-100*103N
F2=75*103N
F3=50*103N

\sigma=F/A
\epsilon=\sigma/E = \frac{F}{A*E}
\delta=\epsilon*L = \frac{F*L}{A*E}


\deltaB = \frac{F1*1.75}{A1*E} + \frac{F2*3}{A1*E} + \frac{F3*3}{A2*E} = 5.1785*10-3m


but that's not right


even looking at the second answer
i thought

\deltaD=\deltaB + \frac{F3*1.5}{A2*E}
but if i plug in THEIR answer for \deltaD i get 2.924mm and not the 5.7 they say
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    23.9 KB · Views: 513
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The forces used in the second and third terms of your equation for \delta_B are wrong. You have to take a cut at each point, draw a free body diagram and sum the forces for equilibrium
 
if so, then why not for the 1st term as well?
 
for a similar problem, but where the diameter was constant and the E was different for the 2 parts, i did exactly that and it worked.
 
i got it, thankls for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K